Author Topic: blockchip thrives off of stuffting on any thread lord tony EVER posts in  (Read 42266 times)

Yeah back in the day when we went after people who distribute back doors. I guess posting rooster and ball torture research in off-topic could also be considered "just posting"

What's your point

Yeah back in the day when we went after people who distribute back doors. I guess posting rooster and ball torture research in off-topic could also be considered "just posting"

What's your point
I think he's trying to say that today's problem users are getting soft. He liked it better when problem users distributed backdoors like him

the problem is we're running out of actual problem users;

Team QI seems to be full of them. Blockchip is even in QI.

Yeah back in the day when we went after people who distribute back doors. I guess posting rooster and ball torture research in off-topic could also be considered "just posting"

What's your point
My point is that there's an emotional buck that whoever's holding it gets to be the forum's poster "problem child," and the problem here is that while tony was more than willing to pass it to Blockchip, Blockchip has too much integrity to pass it on to anyone else.

The only was this'll end is people getting incrementally more and more angry at Blockchip, and the first ban that'll result from this definitely won't be Blockchip's; it'll be some idiot who got caught up in a two-minute-hate and forgots to hide his blatant flaming in sensational brown townogies and piss-poor arguments.


Everyone point lasers at Blockchip. we must eliminate him NOW.
Look! hes leaking stuff. its contaminating the forums.

Look! hes leaking stuff. its contaminating the forums.
funny but accurate

i mean log is right in a small part of it, people do grab his ass for just casually posting anything, even if it's not in response to anything but the topic title
sure blockchip commonly starts stuff, but that doesn't mean you should go after him for posting absolutely anything

i mean log is right in a small part of it

Log and Blockchip are QI buddies so it's a conflict of interest.

I don't know about dooble, they aren't QI buddies but dooble has some connection to blockchip.

These are the only two defending him, both have weird connections.

Log and Blockchip are QI buddies so it's a conflict of interest.

I don't know about dooble, they aren't QI buddies but dooble has some connection to blockchip.

These are the only two defending him, both have weird connections.
why'd you quote me
the reason dooble isn't against blockchip is because people are harassing him for arguing with someone on a place where arguing is common
people just need to really cut him some slack, they're giving him more stuff for what he's doing than warranted

This really feels like bait to get me to respond to it. I'm still not going to do that. U really was going to, but now i'm not because i still don't want to set the precedent that repeatedly pestering me about something is a good way to get me to respond to it.
Feel free to jerk eachother off about how right you are just because I didn't respond to something you said.
oh and another (although late) point
the only real reason you really weren't responding to the counter-argument while you were in there simply for arguing is because you're afraid to admit you're wrong every once in a while
we're all human dude it happens to the best of us, it's just best to admit you're wrong even if it's a small loss
I mean of course my small point wouldn't have stopped you completely but accept your losses regardless


as dumb/hard to understand as some of blocklandblockocitys posts are he's been spot on in this thread

as dumb/hard to understand as some of blocklandblockocitys posts are he's been spot on in this thread

this circlejerk is getting too big

the reason dooble isn't against blockchip is because people are harassing him for arguing with someone on a place where arguing is common

Y'all keep saying this stuff trying to imply that what Blockchip is doing is actual comprehensive intellectual debate and not just line after line of frivolous garbage. An argument usually starts with an idea, has a central point, and ends with a refutation. Blockchip's idea (and apparently your idea) of an argument is, self admittedly, "Give me the last word or I'm going to drop kick the topic off it's rails"

That's not an argument. That's basically the equivalent of posting a picture of an erect snake. It distracts everyone and doesn't provide any contribution to the topic.