Y'all keep saying this stuff trying to imply that what Blockchip is doing is actual comprehensive intellectual debate and not just line after line of frivolous garbage. An argument usually starts with an idea, has a central point, and ends with a refutation. Blockchip's idea (and apparently your idea) of an argument is, self admittedly, "Give me the last word or I'm going to drop kick the topic off it's rails"
Yeah, but this is why ignoring him would help.
When you see someone trying to "derail," you simply ignore it and go on. The biggest issue with Blockchip isn't the fact that he
attempt to derail, but that we allow him to do so. Whenever Blockchip says something even remotely related to Tony, several users tend to swoop in and go: "oh hey look it's Blockchip hating Tony again! whoops!" Then Tony comes in, says some witty one-liner, and what do you know, the thread's derailed.
Tony's not the one doing this. It
would help if Blockchip didn't post in Tony's threads. However, this kind of stance is completely ridiculous. You can't just say: "we shouldn't have this guy in another guy's thread," because maybe, the guy doesn't even want to
participate in the drama that is currently being perpetuated, yet other users throw them back into it.
I'm certain if we didn't just bash Blockchip all the time with the ideology that: "Tony's being attacked and Blockchip's a stuff," we might have less of these dramas and actually important things to do.
I'm not denying that Blockchip is a stuff, either. He is. He could easily stop right now, and we could all just ignore the fact that he previously attacked Tony every chance he got. However, we're aware that he's not going to change at this point, so maybe we could work, ourselves, to make the community better for one day and pretend Blockchip doesn't exist. We're the ones derailing threads, not him.