Author Topic: For all of your Black Lives Matter & racial slur Misconceptions  (Read 12614 times)

Not clicking, explain what it is.


Here you go, here's what an SJW looks like


Sorry, didn't realize that a biased news source that brings up that "there is no white-on-white violence" is trustworthy.
you gonna answer this?

You think Mtv hasn't influenced her content at all?  You must be really naive.  But you know what they say, ignorance is bliss.  Also when I say "hidden agenda" I'm not meaning it like illuminati or some stuff.  Just an agenda that goes against actual logic and morality and instead aims to tear down white people.

BTFO
MTV is definitely NOT trying to tear white people down. Everytime im on their snapchat story, I see Miley Sirus. And if you watch any of her content on her channel, youll see that NONE of it is "anti-white."



Here you go, here's what an SJW looks like
bb i get you're not very fond of jitank but

Quote
here's what an SJW looks like

is really petty

anyways i want to know how many people actually think BLM is an "organization" and why you came to that conclusion

MTV is definitely NOT trying to tear white people down. Everytime im on their snapchat story, I see Miley Sirus. And if you watch any of her content on her channel, youll see that NONE of it is "anti-white."
"they aren't trying to tear down whites because they have whites on snapchat"

Well obviously, they'd have to.  Hard having a media conglomerate like that and only have 13% of the population to choose from, most of which is forgeted to begin with.

anyways i want to know how many people actually think BLM is an "organization" and why you came to that conclusion
http://blacklivesmatter.com/

EDIT: Spelling errors
« Last Edit: July 18, 2016, 12:13:50 AM by ABlockOfCheese »


really though do people just conveniently skip over things like this
blm is not a terrorist organization in the same way muslims are not all terrorists holy stuff
the people who start violence are a small radical minority that gives the entire group a bad rep
"thousands of black people protest peacefully" doesn't make news headlines like "one black person shoots some people"
right before calling whatever a terrorist organization that must be crushed

really though do people just conveniently skip over things like this
is everyone obligated to agree with swollow's statements



Here you go, here's what an SJW looks like
Thats a beautiful SJW

really though do people just conveniently skip over things like this right before calling whatever a terrorist organization that must be crushed
idk but all im doing here is trying to get jitank to stop being a gaymonday

http://blacklivesmatter.com/

EDIT: Spelling errors

well stuff that's kind of dumb

a civil/societal movement that is Black Lives Matter really shouldn't be an "organization" for obvious reasons

BLM is all too similar to the '65 civil rights movement yet it isn't really classified as an "organization"

really though do people just conveniently skip over things like this right before calling whatever a terrorist organization that must be crushed
idk do people conveniently skip over things like this
Sorry, didn't realize that a biased news source that brings up that "there is no white-on-white violence" is trustworthy.

is everyone obligated to agree with swollow's statements
no, what i was saying is that a lot of the people i see who are extremely anti-blm tend to only respond to posts that either support their argument or that can be easily and powerfully rejected
idk do people conveniently skip over things like this
not saying this happens on both sides of the coin but

well stuff that's kind of dumb

a civil/societal movement that is Black Lives Matter really shouldn't be an "organization" for obvious reasons

BLM is all too similar to the '65 civil rights movement yet it isn't really classified as an "organization"
thats why there is actually some degree of merit to labeling it a terrorist organization

Why haven't they come out denouncing the murder of police officers?  Why have they tried to overstep the justice system like they did with zimmerman and jump to a "guilty before proven innocent" conclusion?

Why are they funded by George Soros, who also happens to be a financier of several terrorist organisations?  Of course all of this is circumstantial but its something to think about.