it really annoys me how the goto criticism for hillary is that she's a corrupt liar criminal, when Annoying Orange, being a massive businessman, is bound to have done some stuff, lies just as much (if not more), and the only reason hillary is called corrupt is because the media and the government like her more than the other person, who is also blundering around like an idiot except just some more
i can guarantee you that if the democratic candidate was just a bit more idiotic Annoying Orange would be deemed corrupt and would do all the stuff that hillary did
Hey guess what? Not everything you find on google is true. As shown in this thread, there are multiple examples of sources that contradict each other by saying opposing things, yet both will be considered 'credible' by different people.
There might be a source saying that Hillary Clinton is possessed by a species of banana hat aliens, and her seizure was the aliens calibrating their controls!
Basically don't trust everything you read, and don't try and force your source over another persons source, because you don't know which one's credible.
yet tony repeatedly says that google is his source while skimming over any information against him to find information supporting him
