By 1 game that is probably sold by now, lol.
Bought by unsuspecting people or people who are hoping that they'll release a stuffton of missing content later on, or people that want to spend their money willy-nilly.
Look, Tony, you don't feel the same way as everyone else who bought the game for $60 because
you got the game free, and they didn't. You didn't have to spend a single penny on the game,
because you got it for free. Unfortunately for the others, they had to spend $60 for a game that barely has any content (unless you get your content from the modding community) so they lost
something until they get a refund, or they get their money's worth with content updates. Tell me, how would you feel if you spent $60 on a game that only has the main menu and that's it? Or, imagine you spent $60 on No Man's Sky instead of getting it for free. Would you feel the same way as you are now, or feel the same way the people that spent $60 on it and were disappointed/angered by the fact the developers lied and there is barely much content to keep you occupied for a while? And how would you feel if there wasn't any modding community to give you mods to keep you satisfied?
Now, about the Early Access thing.
You see, if the game was labelled as
EARLY ACCESS, people would understand better about the lack of content. Instead, the developers
RELEASED IT AS A "FULL GAME" with BARELY any content to keep you satisfied for, say 500-1000 hours. People who see games labelled as
EARLY ACCESS know that the game doesn't have much content in it, and they buy Early Access if they like how the game is going, so the developers can keep updating the game and send more content updates. However, since they released it as a "full game" to retail stores and over Steam with barely much content, people are obviously going to hate it.
Also, I'm curious, how did you get No Man's Sky for free?
Edit: Unless you didn't, in which case, I have no idea why you support this game anyways. I have no idea if you own it or not, I need to check.
