Author Topic: Willymcmilly - creepy degenerate  (Read 42553 times)

In order for child research to exist in the first place, someone has to buy a whole recording set and pay an actor and the child to perform in it. They have a whole child research culture that is pretty much funded by all these hidden onion websites. If you want these girls (and boys) to not have a totally forgeted up and broken childhood, you should actually do something about it and help the FBI by reporting any child research in the first place.

Also, people who view or download child research should still be punished for doing it, otherwise everyone will try to do it and more children will be taken advantage of. I don't agree on the whole give them a sentence and go mentality, i think they should be treated like mental patients or drug addicts and undergo rehab, since special interest is pretty much an uncontrollable urge.

i want to remind everyone about something from the news topic i made (thanks mcjob for this post):

If you go by using some very broad and rough average sizes and make assumptions about the filetypes, video lengths and compression, you're looking at around 1.5TBs of content.

and he had around 137,000 images. collected over 4 years.
if you have that much you seriously need to go to prison for several years.. maybe even for life

>guy says something on the internet
>someone else finds it creepy
>that guy is Riddler confirmed and needs to be gassed

/nosupport


>guy says something on the internet
>someone else finds it creepy
>that guy is Riddler confirmed and needs to be gassed

/nosupport

BLOCKLANDS FORUM USER NIX THE GLACEON SUPPORTS A LOCAL child enthusiast ON HIS FAVORITE VIRTUAL LEGO SITE


/your wrists

I don't think Willy understands that law enforcement detains those who simply possess child research because the owners of it know where they got it from and are technically withholding it, meaning that authorities can't crackdown on the distributor/photographer because said owner is refusing to somewhat "turn in" the criminal. I go further in depth and actually contribute but forget it i'm tired so i'm just going to leave a /support even though it means nothing much.

Is Willymcmilly your stuffposting buddy?

It'd make sense, given how you both post similarly handicapped content.
emotional crit

the damage control is real

Not totally damage control, I just want you guys to understand more what i'm saying before I get v&. The way I said stuff did make me come off the wrong way.

So, one more time. I don't support the creation, distribution or ownership of child research, however being someone who only has it and hasn't actually performed loveual acts on children doesn't seem quite as bad as being the one actually doing the deed. Getting rid of the source will stop people from being able to obtain it. Getting rid of the people supporting it only makes the audience smaller.


I disliked him before and I hate him now. Supporting all the way.

however being someone who only has it and hasn't actually performed loveual acts on children doesn't seem quite as bad as being the one actually doing the deed. Getting rid of the source will stop people from being able to obtain it. Getting rid of the people supporting it only makes the audience smaller.
but this is a given. everyone should hold this opinion.

the moment you say "man that 5 years was kinda harsh for a child enthusiast" you begin to come off as a sympathizer and people will instantly go into killer T cell mode.

emotional crit
I was too lazy to go get evidence that you're incapable of making a normal response post, but thankfully your handicap antic nervous system has kicked in to save the day.

I was too lazy to go get evidence that you're incapable of making a normal response post, but thankfully your handicap antic nervous system has kicked in to save the day.
forgetin' hell i'm gonna be out of emotional crits by the end of the day

forgetin' hell i'm gonna be out of emotional crits by the end of the day
jfc can you stop

doesn't seem quite as bad

daily reminder: when I say "not quite as bad", I mean "it's still bad but not quite on the same level of bad as the other thing"

>guy says something on the internet
>someone else finds it creepy
>that guy is Riddler confirmed and needs to be gassed

/nosupport

I wasn't even surprised when I read this, expected you to say this.

forgetin' hell i'm gonna be out of emotional crits by the end of the day
furry + pokemon special interest
the super handicap