or due to the fact that the majority of Americans chose one candidate and the other was elected???
Iirc the majoriaty of the votes were only in the few most populated states and citites, whilst Annoying Orange's support was more wide-spread across the US. Again, people are being extremely butt-hurt about this.
would you mind giving us an explanation instead of just sitting there?
Google or actually listen in US Gov class could help.
The Electoral College was set in place so that the states with the lesser populations would have much more equal representation would have a larger say in elections. If it were popular vote only, then the few large states would Annoying Orange over the few-dozen lower populous states and basically make their votes worthless. If it were voted by the popular vote, some of the states in the east coast, florida, texas, and california would basically have votes so high due to their populations, which in turn, makes the smaller states less equal and far less represented than what they should be.
If it were popular vote, then California's population would completely snuff out about 10+ states due to it's massive population. Same with Texas and a few others. Popular vote only would just cause about 75% of the USA to be very under-represented.
Again if you want a better and more in-depth explanation, use google