stocking - vore spam, disturbed as forget

[Marios]

The problem is is that vore isn't objectively loveual. There is absolutely nothing inherently loveual about eating and digesting a person. Therefor it is not loveual content.

I didn't say it's research, I said it's disgusting.

[Ad Bot]

[rambo1220]

The problem is is that vore isn't objectively loveual. There is absolutely nothing inherently loveual about eating and digesting a person. Therefor it is not loveual content.

alright, well what is the definition and basis of what Vore is.


now what's the definition of erotic


how you're managing to go "oh well it isn't inherently loveual" when yet it was a special interest that arose with the context of it being loveual and when you're also posting stuff like the previous image where the consumed party's ass is sticking up right in the air that pretty much invalidates your entire argument.

[Ronin]

alright, well what is the definition and basis of what Vore is.


now what's the definition of erotic


how you're managing to go "oh well it isn't inherently loveual" when yet it was a special interest that arose with the context of it being loveual and when you're also posting stuff like the previous image where the consumed party's ass is sticking up right in the air that pretty much invalidates your entire argument.

Shoulda defined special interest and then read what it said. Hope this helps.

[Insert Name Here²]

Kinda actually does make it okay. It's the bad deviantart thread. You don't get to pick and choose what's acceptable badness, it's ALL bad.

Yes, because it's vore, it's fine in the bad stuff thread. But what isn't okay is the spamming and using the stuff as a method of trolling.

[Stocking]

alright, well what is the definition and basis of what Vore is.


now what's the definition of erotic
[ ]https://i.gyazo.com/4645a504cdf722957776911dd773a7ac.png[/img]

how you're managing to go "oh well it isn't inherently loveual" when yet it was a special interest that arose with the context of it being loveual and when you're also posting stuff like the previous image where the consumed party's ass is sticking up right in the air that pretty much invalidates your entire argument.

It literally says "erotic desire" because it's subjective. If someone has an erotic desire t forget dogs it doesn't mean that all pictures with dogs are now objectively loveual

[IkeTheGeneric]

But what isn't okay is the spamming and using the stuff as a method of trolling.

If you think it's spamming, then report it.

[rambo1220]

It literally says "erotic desire" because it's subjective. If someone has an erotic desire t forget dogs it doesn't mean that all pictures with dogs are now objectively loveual

dogs weren't created with a loveual connotation, vore was created with a loveual connotation.

[Daswiruch]

well dogs are created by love

[beachbum111111]

You guys should know by now that stocking is a pro at dodging forum rules at this point.

[Khaz]

are you guys really arguing with stocking

[Gytyyhgfffff]

dogs weren't created with a loveual connotation, vore was created with a loveual connotation.

are you having a debate with the most troll troll on the entire forums right now

[Insert Name Here²]

If you think it's spamming, then report it.

Do you seriously think this hasn't been done

[Daswiruch]

Do you seriously think this hasn't been done

if she hasn't been banned for spamming yet after alleged reports then she must not be doing it

[rambo1220]

well dogs are created by love

except love/reproduction is a byproduct of their existence and how they survive just like everything else.

meanwhile, vore was literally bred out of a loveual, erotic special interest context. If it wasn't then we wouldn't be having this discussion.

are you having a debate with the most troll troll on the entire forums right now

albeit a small one, she won't acknowledge anything that discredits her opinion so just thought I'd throw a few cents in here and scoot outta here.

[Stocking]

dogs weren't created with a loveual connotation, vore was created with a loveual connotation.

How do you know? Do you know the artists personally enough to be able to objectively define the purpose of their art?

Also it's pretty sad you think that last pic I posted is loveual. Like a girl is literally about to be digested alive and you're still objectifying her.