Put the shoe on the other foot for a second here. If president Clinton wanted to do the exact same thing and I were saying the same things you were, what would you be telling me?
I'd probably be upset that Clinton won and was doing such a superfluous budget cut to something I care about and agree with you. Did you even read what I said?
There's definitely a side to the GOP that's doesn't like poor people but it's not a broad "they hate poor people" as you seem to be making it out to be.
I dunno, they've had a pretty consistent track record of screwing over the elderly and the poor with their decisions.
Defunding PP is a completely unrelated issue
It's straight up what I was responding to. Planned Parenthood aids a lot of low income families deal with matters such as unwanted pregnancies and providing birth control and guidance to young adults who are way in over their head. It was really unfortunate that they caught a lot of stuff over the fake abortion video nonsense, because their existence only did good for this country.
yeah but fixing stuff so people can have jobs and earn from those jobs isnt hating poor people.
and handing out free money for a lifetime isnt loving poor people.
snowflakes are confused on that. they dont want anything improved, they just want handouts. for themselves or for others.
See this is why I think you're an idiot, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Federal budgets to keep an educational station in a state where they don't have to compete in an extremely competitive market because it directly benefits american children isn't a "Handout"
This is a completely superfluous budget cut, there's no reason to cut it because the money being given to the station is already well invested, the station is doing exactly what they set out to do with what it looks like absolutely no problems. I don't see a reason to pull funding out of PBS, and you haven't done a good job of convincing me otherwise with this "Dam libruls!" bullstuff
