Author Topic: UK Parliament attack; 20 injured, 5 dead  (Read 6362 times)

And if you go to Buckingham Palace the Royal Guards all carry live rifles.
as opposed to dead rifles

I've been in London and the Buckingham Palace and can confirm. The cops in London are 100% unarmed.
It literally says in the first link
"The alleged assailant was shot and killed by armed police"

is this [news]? I can't tell

the topic title is so bad because it wasn't inside parliament and it wasn't even a shooting

as opposed to dead rifles
I am not a gun person.

the topic title is so bad because it wasn't inside parliament and it wasn't even a shooting
It was at the Parliament buildings and there were shots fired, even if by police
 When the topic was created the only information was that there were shots fired by someone.

It literally says in the first link
"The alleged assailant was shot and killed by armed police"
Didn't read the article. Only title I read was the topic title.


When the topic was created the only information was that there were shots fired by someone.
This is true. I literally copied the BBC article title at the time

-snip-
In the UK this is pretty common. I know a lot of muslim people who say they are British Asians.


In the UK this is pretty common. I know a lot of muslim people who say they are British Asians.
Yeah, Asian has a different meaning in the UK than the US. In the UK it refers primarily to the people of South Asia, from countries such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Whereas in the US asian tends to refer to East/Southeast Asia, including countries like China, Japan, Korea and Malaysia.

This difference makes sense if you consider the historical connections between Britain and 'Asia' and the difference between the US's involvement with 'Asia'.
The UK had a strong colonial connection with the Indian subcontinent effectively ruling most of modern India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. As a result this part of Asia was more strongly present in our culture.

The US however had relatively little connection to western Asia but instead has had a closer tie to east Asia. The biggest connection was the large influx of chinese immigrants in the 1800s during the construction of the transcontinental railways. Then later on the US was heavily involved in the 1900s with East Asia via war in the Pacific against Japan in WW2, followed by the Korean and Vietnam wars. And in recent years the big rival of the US has been China. So as far as American culture is concerned the main image of Asia is that of the East, which in the UK would historically be referred to as 'the Orient' or 'Far East', although these days those terms aren't considered as politically correct.

Probably because you live in a stuff neighborhood.
are you handicapped? I live in a place specifically where guns are almost non existant, but it's common knowledge that a high activity centre like london would have armed police officeres protecting it

are you handicapped? I live in a place specifically where guns are almost non existant, but it's common knowledge that a high activity centre like london would have armed police officeres protecting it
I didn't see a single officer with a firearm other than the royal guard.

I didn't see a single officer with a firearm other than the royal guard.
look up conceal carry. still don't get why you think a huge city like london wouldn't have police officers armed with guns

I didn't see a single officer with a firearm other than the royal guard.

Are you saying one of the most important cities in the world doesn't have armed cops lmao