[ALERT!] Terrorist Blows up Manchester Arena - Multiple Injured!

[Tezuni 2.0]

You are either in denial, trolling, or just plain stupid and ignorant of the facts.  I'd wager all three.
There is absolutely no contest when it comes to religion : extremists ratios for Islam.



Just look at Malaysia.  
86% of the Muslims there support sharia law, and 62% of those people support the death penalty for leaving Islam.  
That's 53% of all Muslims in Malaysia that are extremists.

Now look at the rest of them.
Islam is a cancerous, outdated belief system from the dark ages, highly prone to producing radicalization, that has no place on modern society.

99% of afghans want sharia law and 79% of those people would have you killed for leaving Islam.
That translates to 78% of all Muslims in Afghanistan that say follow Islam or die.

[Ad Bot]

[HellHound]

y-yeah but it's intolerant!!!

[Remurr]

wait so this is a bomb correct? i heard it was a balloon.

[PhantOS]

99% of afghans want sharia law and 79% of those people would have you killed for leaving Islam.
That translates to 78% of all Muslims in Afghanistan that say follow Islam or die.

99% of your graphs are bullstuff. There's no visible sample size so they mean nothing and show nothing

In all my experience with pew forum, their sample sizes range from 1000-10,000 people from a very specific sector, which goes to show that they are entirely inconclusive for judging the majority

[Tactical Nuke]

99% of your graphs are bullstuff. There's no visible sample size so they mean nothing and show nothing

it's literally the loving Pew Research Center

you guys rail on us for not taking the NY Times seriously anymore, jesus

[Kearn]

It has nothing to do with them being muslim

There's no visible sample size so they mean nothing and show nothing

[Alteration]

Why don't we just let all the terrorists blow themselves up? Then we won't have any terrorists left to fight.

[PhantOS]

it's literally the loving Pew Research Center

you guys rail on us for not taking the NY Times seriously anymore, jesus

no you don't understand. When you have a small sample size the conclusion is "x% of people interviewed say this" but conservatives in their infinite knowledge translate that to "x% of the total population that is 500x larger than the sample size say this"

[Master Matthew²]

99% of your graphs are bullstuff. There's no visible sample size so they mean nothing and show nothing

In all my experience with pew forum, their sample sizes range from 1000-10,000 people from a very specific sector, which goes to show that they are entirely inconclusive for judging the majority

Translation: This doesn't fit with my Narrative, so here's some unproven bullstuff to try and discredit a well known and renowned organization.

It didn't work with Wikileaks it wont work with Pew Research

[PhantOS]

Master "0.01% of a population defines the other 99.9%" matthew

[Kearn]

its really cute that you dont know how statistics work considering they gave the margin of error doofus

[Rally]

99% of your graphs are bullstuff. There's no visible sample size so they mean nothing and show nothing
In all my experience with pew forum, their sample sizes range from 1000-10,000 people from a very specific sector, which goes to show that they are entirely inconclusive for judging the majority

"The survey involved a total of more than 38,000 face-to-face interviews in 80-plus languages. It covered Muslims in 39 countries, which are divided into six regions in this report – Southern and Eastern Europe (Russia and the Balkans), Central Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, and sub-Saharan Africa."

http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/

not trying to jump in on the argument, just wanted to post the information behind the graph

[Tezuni 2.0]

no you don't understand. When you have a small sample size the conclusion is "x% of people interviewed say this" but conservatives in their infinite knowledge translate that to "x% of the total population that is 500x larger than the sample size say this"

The sample sizes have set margins of error and if you took a statistics class you'd realize they are well over what is considered 'too small'.
You are simply uneducated and willfully ignorant.

Come back with facts and data or shut the forget up and quit peddling the toxic narrative that Islam only has a 'small number of extreme individuals'.
You're wrong and we've all proven it several times here.

[Tactical Nuke]

no you don't understand. When you have a small sample size the conclusion is "x% of people interviewed say this" but conservatives in their infinite knowledge translate that to "x% of the total population that is 500x larger than the sample size say this"

"99% of scientists who took this poll agree climate change exists, therefore that must mean 99% of ALL scientists agree climate change exists!!1!1!11!!1!!!"
"1 in 5 women who took this poll were loveually assaulted in their lifetime, therefore that must mean 1 in 5 women IN GENERAL will be loveually assaulted in their lifetime!!1!1!!1!!1!!11!!"

[PhantOS]

its really cute that you dont know how statistics work considering they gave the margin of error doofus

the margin of error doesnt mean much in what im sayinf. What im saying is that a sample size is meant to reach a statistical conclusion but that conclusion is entirely within the scope of the people interviewed. Its not proof that 50% of muslims are radical, and to assume that is to draw an incorrect conclusion.