America was founded on immigration
also why am i seeing this argument constantly? "america" (hence the quotes, UK colonized it) was founded in colonization and
then was founded by a bunch of rebels who hated britain's king because he was taxing them to loving death, not on immigration. immigration is entering someone's
country unless if you're implying a bunch of native americans count as a country...and if that's the case how are native americans considered a country? they weren't waving a flag that represented their country, they didn't form any government system type, and they certainly don't have an economy or anything else. native americans were just a bunch of people that were born in north american
land, not born in a country. i may as well be overthinking this a lot but immigration
by it's own definition is based on countries, not on land.
i want someone to refute me and not be a stuck-up cunt about it because i am seriously questioning this argument being used by liberals.