No, you feed the troll by replying to him to begin with. If you're going to waste time making a reply to someone who you think is trolling then why stuff up the thread even more with dumb stuff instead of making a coherent reply that makes sense. You don't look better by spewing memes and stroking each other's richards just because you're posting in a tony thread.
No stuff?
"Memes" and joking banter to derail Tony's bullstuff is multitudes better than say, gullible idiots trying to argue with tony with their "coherent replies". It fuels Tony's attention scheme way more as he would always have someone to respond to with his bullstuff. The ideal situation of course would be no responses, but the same people fall for Tony's bait every. loving. time.
Good job proving my point time and time again that you deserve my aggression.
What is the point in saying this? Next time, instead of saying how someone deserves your aggression you should either shut the forget up or actually give them some aggression so you don't come off as a pretentious scumbag.
Thanks for the coherent reply; This isn't about Tony only, and the people who disagree purely because it's related to Tony in a way exemplifies the fact that people would rather waste time typing up a garbage meme response and put themselves on the same level as someone like Tony than be level-headed and ignore the thread entirely like you've suggested if they think it's fishy.
Sorry buddy, but I'd like to think the people who don't take Tony's trolling to heart are far better than Tony trolling.
The reasonable route is to not loving respond if you don't think it's worth your time but everyone just has to dive in and spew baseless garbage instead.
Wow, after all that bullstuff you finally crafted a statement with some sense. I applaud you and agree.
