Jesus forget are you guys intentionally missing my point?
Your idea of what the first amendment should cover would be way more disastrous than you think. It would set nasty anti-consumer precedents and it would not necessarily protect people from violation of service regardless, since companies still reserve the right to ban you from their service for pretty much any reason.
i cant see what better alternative to discord will pop up, the program that alone punched skype, teamspeak and mumble in the gut and caused a mass migration and even an exodus of people who dont even use IRC programs to it
It's hard to imagine what an alternative would be when there isn't one; if Discord is truly censoring opinions to further an agenda, nut up and boycott it or shut up about it. That's all that needs to be said, really.
i mean, technically yeah you're right. i suppose i don't see them as true patriots then lol
What you could say is that nationalists don't act within the best interests in their country, but rather the best interests for themselves, effectively making the patriotism moot.
