Author Topic: JBlitz404 (43207) pure unadulterated autism  (Read 14547 times)


I've been following the politics thread since before you were posting in it. You think you know how to argue but you really, really don't. My advice is to wait on pushing your political views until you're a little older than 15 and have little more social experience under your belt. Give it a rest. You aren't accomplishing anything doing what you're doing.

An argument is about proving if your opinion is right. An argument will always be informal, no matter what. It's nothing more than two sides (maybe more) trying to prove who's correct. You're not getting that. Age isn't a limiting factor in an argument. That's ageism in its purest form.

That's the point, though. It's all about proving who's wrong and who's right. Isn't that what an argument is? You clearly were participating in one, no matter how much you deny it.
sorry but that's just a dumb and childish opinion
an argument isn't standing your ground, it's about understanding both sides and forming a conclusion off of it that you (and preferably the other guy) can agree with

don't care how old you are but if you just want to waste people's time by getting into a hissy fit about something everyone else disagree with, by all means, but don't expect people to defend or like you

I may have delved too deep in my own thoughts

This stuff actually warrants a brainpost lol. I hope this isn't the way you speak to people at school.

Reading several articles and calling out wrong information presented about them means direct "support"? You're called only VICE biased, even though OP also linked incredibly-biased news sources. I was just showing who was in the wrong right there. OP's claims about those articles could be quickly backfired by a quick read through them all.

...Yes. I'm not sure what you think 'direct support' means but you argued in their favor. That's supporting them. Or defending them. Or shilling them. It's all the same thing.

Who are you even referring to? I'm not aware of any bias news sources that Punished Toxicology has recently posted lmfao. I'm not even really sure what this post means. You weren't showing anybody anything back then and you're still not showing anybody anything right now.

sorry but that's just a dumb and childish opinion
an argument isn't standing your ground, it's about understanding both sides and forming a conclusion off of it that you (and preferably the other guy) can agree with

don't care how old you are but if you just want to waste people's time by getting into a hissy fit about something everyone else disagree with, by all means, but don't expect people to defend or like you
its almost as if hes a dumb child

its almost as if hes a dumb child
he's 15 he should learn how to be socially coherent by now

he's 15 he should learn how to be socially coherent by now

Continue to ignore the other side of the spectrum. You have no full understanding of what others and I believe in who want to raise awareness of. I shouldn't have to point this on, but it's already becoming tiring.

Continue to ignore the other side of the spectrum. You have no full understanding of what others and I believe in who want to raise awareness of. I shouldn't have to point this out, but it's already becoming tiring.

Continue to ignore the other side of the spectrum. You have no full understanding of what others and I believe in who want to raise awareness of. I shouldn't have to point this out, but it's already becoming tiring.


An argument is about proving if your opinion is right. An argument will always be informal, no matter what. It's nothing more than two sides (maybe more) trying to prove who's correct. You're not getting that. Age isn't a limiting factor in an argument. That's ageism in its purest form.
Statements like this are what this whole drama are about, you forgetin shmuck. It's this "I'm smarter than you" attitude you can't put away. Maybe you're doing it accidentally, I dunno, but you really type like an starfish dude. I know what an argument is, thanks. I really, really needed 3 sentences to get it.

My point in bringing up your age is that you lack a lot of the perspective required to have a well thought out political opinion, so when you tell other people they haven't really figured their own ideas out, you look like total idiot. If you're 15 you're what, one year into high school? You almost certainly haven't experienced enough in your life or had enough exposure to either side of the political spectrum to have formed a proper opinion on it.

Continue to ignore the other side of the spectrum. You have no full understanding of what others and I believe in who want to raise awareness of. I shouldn't have to point this on, but it's already becoming tiring.

???

My point in bringing up your age is that you lack a lot of the perspective required to have a well thought out political opinion, so when you tell other people they haven't really figured their own ideas out, you look like total idiot. If you're 15 you're what, one year into high school? You almost certainly haven't experienced enough in your life or had enough exposure to either side of the political spectrum to have formed a proper opinion on it.

Yes, because age determines how experienced you are in certain fields? I may be lower than the average age group of BLF, but that doesn't mean I lack awareness. If I'm curious about a subject, I will look more into it. My choice, anyways. You're trying to use my age as an excuse to put me down as if I'm someone who can't be taken seriously. That's ageism you're using, yet you won't admit it. I've only made a statement about intelligence two times and that was in a response to a a couple of jokes.


Yes, because age determines how experienced you are in certain fields

Yup, it sure does. That's why I'm allowed to vote and you're not.

Yes, because age determines how experienced you are in certain fields? I may be lower than the average age group of BLF, but that doesn't mean I lack awareness. If I'm curious about a subject, I will look more into it. My choice, anyways. You're trying to use my age as an excuse to put me down as if I'm someone who can't be taken seriously. That's ageism you're using, yet you won't admit it. I've only made a statement about intelligence two times and that was in a response to a a couple of jokes.
Please reread the first paragraph of my last post and take to heart, because you're still doing it.

Yes, because age determines how experienced you are in certain fields?
Literally, yes. Experience takes time, and aging takes time. Ergo, age = experience.

I may be lower than the average age group of BLF, but that doesn't mean I lack awareness. If I'm curious about a subject, I will look more into it.
You very clearly lack awareness in news media and social conventions. I'm willing to believe you aren't very aware about politics either, although I really can't tell because everything you've said in the politics thread has been vague as hell.

You're trying to use my age as an excuse to put me down as if I'm someone who can't be taken seriously. That's ageism you're using, yet you won't admit it. I've only made a statement about intelligence two times and that was in a response to a a couple of jokes.
I'm just not. I'm saying you can't be taken seriously because you as a person are inexperienced and not very smart. That you're 15 lends credence to that point, but it's not the crux of my argument. And I swear to god if I have to read the word "ageism" one more time I'm gonna burst a blood vessel.