what happened after russia nuked usa in hotline miami 2
I dunno, the game was banned in Australia.
where does chell go after portal 2?
We don't know. Valve were extremely cagey with any further details in that ending. You'll need to wait for the next one.
is Eli Vance kill?
Yes.
is goofys death canon?
I'm not an activist, and I'm not a cynic. I'm just a person who wants to place a high value on honor and self-respect. To begin with, Goofy is frightened that we might ratchet up our level of understanding. That's why he's trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that his antics are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved, and they promote the mistaken idea that the ideas of “freedom” and “favoritism” are Siamese twins.
Goofy maintains that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. In the long run, however, he's only fooling himself. Goofy would be better off if he just admitted to himself that we get more from him than we do from most surly rakes. We get more lies, more distortions, more fear, more hatred, more division. We get Goofy behaving like Goofy. Unfortunately, self-satisfied fence-sitters who advertise “magical” diets and bogus weight-loss pills make no effort to contend with the inevitable consequences of that action.
On that note, let me say that Goofy's thesis is that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. That's completely postmodernist, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that we must always tell the truth. A condition of truth is to allow suffering to speak, which is why it's important to recognize that Goofy used to maintain that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. When he realized that no one was falling for that claptrap, he quickly changed his tune to say that might makes right. Goofy is definitely a pro-censorship liar, and shame on anyone who believes him.
Goofy obviously intends to take what few remaining kernels of traditionalist thought remain and eviscerate them with the convoluted hogwash of presentism, dogmatism, and hedonism. The direful sequence of that result, so flagrantly delusional and morbid in itself, is that sinful personæ non gratæ will galvanize the odious herd into enthusiastically supporting Goofy's inaniloquent, intemperate bunco games when you least expect it. He and I disagree about our civic duties. I avow that we must do our utmost to explain a few facets of this confusing world around us. Goofy, on the other hand, thinks that women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras.
I condemn Goofy's gross and systematic violations of human rights. I'm not just talking about the arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, torture, and summary executions but also about my previous observation that even relative to the rest of his posse, Goofy is a fascinatingly exotic paladin of caciquism, a neon pearooster in a field of Guernsey cows. What's even more fascinating is that Goofy believes it's perfectly okay to exploit the feelings of charity and guilt that many people have over the plight of the homeless. More than anything else, such beliefs shed light on Goofy's moral values and suggest incontrovertibly that he contends that everything I say is both materialistic and unbridled. Seldom do I pause to answer such criticism of my work and ideas. If I did, I would find little time for anything other than such correspondence in the course of the day, and I would have absolutely no time for constructive work. Hence, I intend to condense my response into the following remark: I am not au fait with Goofy's latest claims. I am, however, quite familiar with the manner in which he has been denying the obvious. In particular, I know that I've been trying to get him to admit that he has been snaffling far more than his fair share of attention. Yes, I know what you're thinking: Getting him to admit such a thing would challenge even the most patient of Zen masters. Nevertheless, I feel that it's worth a try because the legality of Goofy's sanguinolent utterances seems dubious. Alas, I am not aware of any lawsuit that has challenged them so all we can say for now is that whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may explain the Goofy factor in the equation of isolationism and, as the alternative, the rummy and contemptuous dirigisme currently being forced upon us by Goofy. Choose carefully because if the people generally are relying on false information sown by tactless ruffians, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation.
This march into unforgiving etatism is not happening by mere chance. It is not, as many unruly scamps insist, the result of the natural, inevitable course of things. It is happening as a direct result of Goofy's scabrous bruta fulmina. Even if our society had no social problems at all we could still say that that's not the most frightening thing about Goofy. Have you heard that he displays enormous arrogance, largely manifested in condescension towards the average citizen? I myself find information like that disturbing on so many levels that I can't help but want to draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word “physiologicoanatomic”.
Goofy alleges that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. Even if this were so, Goofy would still be obstinate. But I am undoubtedly not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how the powerful exploit difference in order to divide the powerless and thereby strengthen their grip. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance.
Goofy has commented that education and open-mindedness are some kind of liability. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. We cannot get away from the adamantine and tenebrous fact that it's amazing that impudent, incontinent gomerals like him still exist in this day and age. Now that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true. Goofy always demands instant gratification. That's all that is of concern to him. Nothing else matters—except maybe to cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills. I tell you this because our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to make this world a kinder, gentler place, we must keep his shock troops at bay. I consider that requirement a small price to pay because Goofy has been filling our children's minds with headstrong and debasing superstitions. That's just a tiny facet of what all of us will face if we let him assuage the hungers of his sycophants with servings of fresh scapegoats.
Goofy says that slimy nudniks are the most oppressed people in our society. That is the most despicable lie I have ever heard in my entire life. I am, of course, referring to a recent occurrence that is so well-known it requires no comment except to add that I would never take a job working for him. Given his blasphemous ipse dixits, who would want to? Although I myself have had enough of Goofy's waste, fraud, misfeasance, and malfeasance, it is also true that Mohockism is sustained by rigid ideological categories. This is a perverse paradox, the implications of which are too cantankerous to dwell on short of saying that Goofy is unhappy that people like me want to study the problem and recommend corrective action. Such cavils notwithstanding, his policy is to provoke irascible provincials into action. Then, Goofy uses their responses in whatever way he sees fit, generally to influence the attitudes of dominant culture towards any environment or activity that is predominantly grungy.
It strikes me as amusing that Goofy complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain. He has especially been targeting schools and universities, trying to convert them into indoctrination centers for racism. Once such institutions of learning can be coerced into suppressing freedom of expression, free inquiry, independent research, and all objectivity, they will become training grounds for shrewish, effrontive mental defectives who are dedicated to serving Goofy and carrying out his plan of replacing intellectual discourse with programs designed to instill sectarian and ideological doctrines. He plans to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. He has instructed his lackeys not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, Goofy knows he has something to hide. Let me close by reminding you that the time has come to lead the way to the future, not to the past.
Goofy is kill.
why do you play bad games
I don't. I play good games which have some unfortunate mistakes, but otherwise are enjoyable. I'm not a super cynical roosterface who only plays le indie games and obscure Japanese titles because the "big bad evil American AAA industry is only here to steal our money and kill babies."
does sound work in the vacuum of space in mass effect andromeda?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHHrXNQC9i4Poof.
How do you think those bois in Halo Wars II are gonna feel when they see that Arbie 'N the Chief are best buddies in Halo 6?
I'll let you know when I feel like wasting my money on Halo Wars 2 which I probably won't ever feel motivated to play.
how are they gonna forget up halo 6's story
https://www.reddit.com/r/halo/comments/5vs78u/bonnie_ross_we_want_to_tell_a_more_simple_story/343 are focused too much on very specific niches who will religiously buy their products. Bungie are all-encompassing; they put their company goal (to open the experience for everybody and help build long-lasting friendships) ahead of what's easiest, whereas 343 don't have enough trust in the gaming public and instead misguide their focus on these specific gaming profiles who end up frustrated that they're doing too much or too little in certain areas.
Design should never, ever attempt to build the game the fans
say they want. That's what Halo 4 and 5 were. Design should always create what the fans don't know they want, but will learn to need.
