banned for clickpushing

[PhantOS]

I get it that the purpose of the mechanic is to help alleviate blocking but holy stuff you can't ban people for using a mechanic you added into the game. that's just terrible.

It's like that 'no freekilling' rule that all terrible city rps have. There's always like 40+ guns in the game but the admins, in their infinite wisdom, make using any of them for any reason bannable. You can either

a) ban anyone who uses them and be an absolutely terrible host

or

b) disable the loving guns / put a limit on them so there will never be a reason to ban anyone

how's a cooldown going to completely fix the fact that you can still use it unlimited amount of times enough to where pushing people is completely irritating?

Maybe it won't. In that case, having an extremely exploitable and handicapped mechanic so broken that you need to ban people for using it is already more 'irritating' than people misusing it

[Ad Bot]

[Dreams_Of_Cheese]

man if you can't follow a "Dont be irritating" rule you're the one with the problem

[Køtt]

Maybe it won't. In that case, having an extremely exploitable and handicapped mechanic so broken that you need to ban people for using it is already more 'irritating' than people misusing it

because a feature that's purpose is to rid of a common problem and it being used in a different way just to irritate people is not "exploitable and handicapped", holy stuff dude

[AverageDude]

I get it that the purpose of the mechanic is to help alleviate blocking but holy stuff you can't ban people for using a mechanic you added into the game. that's just terrible.

It's like that 'no freekilling' rule that all terrible city rps have. There's always like 40+ guns in the game but the admins, in their infinite wisdom, make using any of them for any reason bannable. You can either

a) ban anyone who uses them and be an absolutely terrible host

or

b) disable the loving guns / put a limit on them so there will never be a reason to ban anyone
Maybe it won't. In that case, having an extremely exploitable and handicapped mechanic so broken that you need to ban people for using it is already more 'irritating' than people misusing it

The difference is; this isn't a terrible city rp, this is a serious gamemode that is moderated seriously.

This was added with restrictions to it to prevent people from being annoying.  You breaks this rule and gets banned, I don't see an issue here.

Both you and You should accept that you're wrong and take your losses, pursuing this further only makes you both look stupid.

[PhantOS]

it is exploitable and handicapped, that's why it shouldn't be there. adding exploitable mechanics already is a red flag for the quality of a server

Both you and You should accept that you're wrong and take your losses, pursuing this further only makes you both look stupid.

This is a loving open discussion, not a 'you're wrong im right' scenario. As i said, if your mechanic has the ability to be entirely exploited to forget with the game, you should remove it loving ASAP.

[PhantOS]

There's several alternatives to fix he issue. You could use that one no-collision dll. you could make hallways bigger. both of these solutions will maintain the integrity of your server without you having to ban 50% of the people you come across because they're breaking your weird rules.

Or you can just ignore the core of the issue and focus on the superficial, which is banning anyone who uses it

[Darryl McKoy]

This is a loving open discussion, not a 'you're wrong im right' scenario.

Well no, this is a drama thread where the OP is clearly wrong for what he did - irrespective of whether you agree with the mechanic or not.

[AverageDude]

it is exploitable and handicapped, that's why it shouldn't be there. adding exploitable mechanics already is a red flag for the quality of a server
This is a loving open discussion, not a 'you're wrong im right' scenario. As i said, if your mechanic has the ability to be entirely exploited to forget with the game, you should remove it loving ASAP.

It was added to fix an issue and a rule was added so people would know not to exploit it, which You did clearly not understand and was banned for and now tries to justify his wrongdoing by refusing to explain himself and demanding explanations from others.

[AverageDude]

There's several alternatives to fix he issue. You could use that one no-collision dll. you could make hallways bigger. both of these solutions will maintain the integrity of your server without you having to ban 50% of the people you come across because they're breaking your weird rules.

Or you can just ignore the core of the issue and focus on the superficial, which is banning anyone who uses it

Making doorways bigger would take a lot of unnecessary work and having no collision with combat can be exploited EASILY, which I'm sure your advice would be to remove no collision.

[Køtt]

adding exploitable mechanics already is a red flag for the quality of a server

if you think mechanics like clickpushing cause problems more than solve problems and your only suggestion is "make a cooldown timer for it" and other stuff that makes 0 difference i don't really see why anyone would take you seriously.

[Køtt]

doublepost i didn't read what phantos also suggested. okay i guess.

[Darryl McKoy]

It pretty much comes down to:
1. Do x, y or z to fix the systemic cause of the issue, or
2. Ban the few people who act like handicaps and abuse it (benefit: they'll probably act like handicaps even if you fix the issue)

[RazerBL]

If somebody joins a server with the intention of misusing a mechanic that we added to solve more problems than cause, then I don't think they are there for the purpose of the actual game mode. As such, why would banning them because they caused a nuisance and aren't playing for the purpose of the game mode go unjustified?

[RazerBL]

despair syndrome sucks

Double post, but this basically says it all. You don't want to be there. So why are you getting all sad when I banned you for breaking the rules?

[Mr Queeba]

/nosupport. you clearly got mad about a rule you disagreed with and decided to break it.