Author Topic: dumb rant: shadman  (Read 34437 times)

right so producing child research for other potential child predators to enjoy is better than him loving kids
got it

Well if they aren't loving kids either Id rather they whack their willies to that. I'm pretty sure there's a level of disassociation people have when looking at hentai and stuff, they certainly don't look like actual children. I'd be worried about the guys making loli stuff with girls that look uncannily real.

Also Im pretty sure Hoot was talking about "its up to the character's creator's say on the age" part, which is bullstuff. Obviously people look at kiddy research, how is that what you took away from it.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2017, 02:34:32 AM by Vigil »

http://thechronicleherald.ca/metro/1284433-ex-nscad-technician-gets-90-days-for-possession-of-child-research

one example

right so producing child research for other potential child predators to enjoy is better than him loving kids
got it
thats literally just one case. that does not correlate at all to tour broad as forget statement.

i thought everyone just agreed that degenerates like him belonged on a cross and went on their way

Gosh Nonnel you should be more tolerant and accepting. What are you? creepphobic?

Its cartoons, don't get your starfish in a twist. Has he ever specifically said the people he draws are under 18? Doesn't matter what the forget it looks like, its whatever he says the age is. Its his content.

Except he does alot of r34 stuff where the characters are underage in the loving story. I mean forget he drew Keemstars daughter


Except he does alot of r34 stuff where the characters are underage in the loving story. I mean forget he drew Keemstars daughter

Did it say they were under 18? I've already gone over this. Its gross as stuff but doesnt mean its illegal.

thats literally just one case. that does not correlate at all to tour broad as forget statement.
are you with loli or are you against it
are you loveually attracted to children or opposed to it
you're taking potshots at the moon here. you won't get anywhere just arguing for no reason. look up "lolicon linked to creeps" and you will find something.

Gosh Nonnel you should be more tolerant and accepting. What are you? creepphobic?


Did it say they were under 18? I've already gone over this. Its gross as stuff but doesnt mean its illegal.



In other news Vigil is probably a child enthusiast


That's cool that you post an infographic with no indication on what "lolicon" legally entails, so gg.

That's cool that you post an infographic with no indication on what "lolicon" legally entails, so gg.

yeah cause loli is a really undefined term


yeah cause loli is a really undefined term

And again I repeatedly say that its the artist's discretion on what the age of the character is.