Author Topic: Saudi arabia said lebanon declared war against them  (Read 5456 times)

no, besides the nuclear fallout destroying everything around it like europe, russia and east asia as well the middle east and probably the americas for years, and we don't account for the huge humanitarian issues the world would hold against the nuker and possibly destroy the world economy and stability with that, it would only create a ton more deaths and a whole lot more internal chaos in that region

nuking is not a viable option unless you want to destroy the planet

This is reasonable enough that I can retract saying that it would end the continuous state of warfare in the middle-east if given the appropriate target.

-snip and quote-
I'm not trying to remain a hypocrite I am trying to learn. I made way more salt in this discussion than I wanted though.

Now that everyone seemed to take that I were advocating for it (which I said I wasn't multiple times) versus stating what I thought would happen if it were done (which is what I said I was saying) I will take my leave since this is far saltier of a discussion than I even wanted to make.

Sorry to offend anyone I didn't want it either.
« Last Edit: November 06, 2017, 06:07:15 PM by Kamutog »

They'd be too busy dealing with mutated wildlife and ghouls to focus on war.
ya but war never changes so


I'm glad I derailed this topic with some cheap, edgy humor.

Too many people are like "Oh let's not do that because it's immoral and will kill innocents," thus sustaining the current situation, for long enough that it eventually will cause even more lives to be lost than a nuke would've brought, in time.
1. "It eventually will cause even more lives to be lost". What is 'it'?

2. Take the civil strife of the modern middle east and multiply it by 100. That's how bad it would be if we decided to just unilaterally nuke some Middle Eastern country for no reason.


after the cleaning house they are doing, im all supporting SA right now.

The perfect excuse to wipe them out with those cool fighter jets Hillary Clinton gave them! The liberals are doing more for the extermination of Muslim culture than the alt-right could ever hope to.

alright I tried to look into Lebanese politics to see what's up with Hezbollah and their relationship with the ruling parties
my conclusion is that it's a clusterforget and i don't even want to think about it

Basically, there are two broad electoral alliances: the March 8 alliance, and the March 14 alliance. Neither has a consistent ideology, though there is one key difference: the March 8 alliance supports the Syrian government, while the March 14 alliance opposes it. The far-right Islamic militarist group Hezbollah is part of the March 8 alliance, as is the Free Patriotic Movement, a Christian center-right party, the Amal Movement, a Shia center-right party, and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party, a secular ultranationalist/fascist party, among many other groups. The March 14 alliance is largely composed of conservatives, liberals, and social democrats, though there is one (non-militant) Islamist group, and and a democratic socialist group. The President of Lebanon is from the FPM, and thus the March 8 alliance; the March 8 alliance also has a parliamentary majority.  However, that doesn't necessarily mean that Lebanon is behind Hezbollah. Further complicating matters is that the Prime Minister actually comes from the March 14 alliance, which is strange, considering they don't have parliamentary control.

TLDR: March 8 is pro-Syria and mostly tends towards the right (with some exceptions). March 14 is pretty diverse but mostly excludes extremist parties. March 8 is, broadly speaking, in power. Hezbollah, a terrorist group that has attacked Saudi Arabia at times, is part of the March 8 alliance. Hence, Saudi Arabia is pretty mad at Lebanon.

Final edit: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-lebanon-politics/saudi-arabia-says-lebanon-declares-war-deepening-crCIA-idUSKBN1D61SZ Here's another article
« Last Edit: November 07, 2017, 02:17:12 AM by TristanLuigi »

We should nuke the US and Europe since they cause all the problems in the world. The casualties from the nukes will pale in comparison to what they would do left to their own devices
What's wrong with you Kamutog

We should nuke the US

The majority of casualties will be liberals because they don't believe in things like gun rights and self sustainability. Lets get it done

The majority of casualties will be liberals because they don't believe in things like gun rights and self sustainability. Lets get it done
because a nuke gives two stuffs about your political stance and whether or not you have a tiny pea shooter

because a nuke gives two stuffs about your political stance and whether or not you have a tiny pea shooter

Goth "ICBM's don't exist because the earth is flat and gravity is a lie" 77

Goth "ICBM's don't exist because the earth is flat and gravity is a lie" 77
Ral "A nuke won't kill you if you are non-liberal and own a firearm" ly

Nuclear warheads use the process of nuclear fusion of hydrogen atoms to create energy. You know what hydrogen fusion creates?

Helium. That's right. The stuff that causes balloons to literally defy gravity itself. That means that there's no way nukes can be real, because they'd just simply float upward into space, because helium is less dense than air.