Oh I'm vary aware but since this is government policy that doesn't play into effect.
what?
so you're saying that we can only talk about government policy in terms of already-existing laws, and that government policy should have nothing to do with what's right or wrong?
The government is an unfeeling machine that exists only to better its people.
yes
to better its peoplenet neutrality would better its people, even though it's not constitutionally mandatory
nobody is arguing that the government is constitutionally
required to keep net neutrality, and if you do see someone argue that, they're probably an idiot
we're arguing that net neutrality is a good thing. two different things.
legality is not a measure of whether something is good.