Is Communism the worst? Or national socialistsm is the worst?

Poll

Which one is the worst political party?

Communists
73 (49.3%)
national socialists
75 (50.7%)

Total Members Voted: 148

Author Topic: Is Communism the worst? Or national socialistsm is the worst?  (Read 16735 times)

stalin and Riddler were both equally terrible people
that's not true; Stalin was standing on the shoulders of Lenin.

stalin had a better mustache than Riddler; communism is superior

commienism is based around hating rich people so sorry kiddos but your arguments dont work

yeah but Riddler was a war hero and stalin was an armchair general so Riddler wins

the world would be better off without brazil
Inb4filepe

Nearly all of the communist territories were authoritarian, but communism necessarily doesn't need authoritarianism to work. That's why we gotta stay on the lookout to make sure that cancer never crops up here.
People say this, but greed is human nature and as a result there has never been a truely “communist/socialist” nation in the way Marx intended it. Marx was an outstanding sociologist when it came to perceving what the world was like at the time, but his ideas on how to change what he percevied are inherently flawed. I actually just got done doing a final project on him for my sociology class, and personally I think he would have changed many of his philosophys if he had seen how people used them to create the exact sort of dystopian sociaty he was fighting against in europe at the time

Right, if you stop at the idea alone, but take actions into account.

okay both ideologies had governments that were war-mongering and both systematically executed the rich class in their society

fascists believed that jews had sold out their country for monetary gain at the end of WWI, so they went after the Jews
it was easier, too, because they had a moniker to label the "greedy rich people" with as opposed to the communists who just had "grrr rich people"
they weren't tribal therefore they went after the Jews, they saw the Jews as the communists saw the rich people of society and therefore went after them and that made them tribal

they're literally not different

People say this, but greed is human nature and as a result there has never been a truely “communist/socialist” nation in the way Marx intended it. Marx was an outstanding sociologist when it came to perceving what the world was like at the time, but his ideas on how to change what he percevied are inherently flawed. I actually just got done doing a final project on him for my sociology class, and personally I think he would have changed many of his philosophys if he had seen how people used them to create the exact sort of dystopian sociaty he was fighting against in europe at the time

I said what I said because communism doesn't need an authoritarian regime to get a leg to stand on. That's why it's on par with fascism on the whole "Things we don't want here in the west"


they weren't tribal therefore they went after the Jews, they saw the Jews as the communists saw the rich people of society and therefore went after them and that made them tribal

Are you just completely spacing the whole aryan supremacy thing?

>Is Communism the worst? Or national socialistsm is the worst?

>liberal makes post about why national socialistsm is evil
>conservatives interpret it as an implicit defense of communism
>stuffstorm

>conservative makes post about why communism is evil
>liberals interpret it as an implicit defense of national socialistsm
>stuffstorm

these threads all follow the same pattern. communism and national socialistsm are both terrible ideologies, and it doesn't create useful discussions to argue about which one is 'worse' because that's a multifaceted question that doesn't have an easy answer.

why not just agree they both suck?


Are you just completely spacing the whole aryan supremacy thing?

I read the title wrong and thought it said fascism, which isn't inherently tribal, as opposed to national socialistsm, which is

that being said, it's a lot easier to get your agenda of kicking out the rich done if you theorize that your blood makes you a million times more qualified to own what the rich do

seventh i think that is a wrong conclusion to draw

Everyone agrees that communism and national socialistsm are bad but national socialistsm is inherently evil ontop of being bad while communism just doesnt work

seventh i think that is a wrong conclusion to draw

Everyone agrees that communism and national socialistsm are bad but national socialistsm is inherently evil ontop of being bad while communism just doesnt work
<idealogy based around hating anyone with more money than you
<demands revolution and violence against other classes
<just doesnt work

ok but how much you wanna bet “literally hating rich people” isnt actually literal

national socialism is fundamentally facism which isnt horrible but not preferrable
communism is an incredibly flawed concept in practice

ok but how much you wanna bet “literally hating rich people” isnt actually literal

I'd bet my left nipple on the opposite