Hey, if anyone wants to run for president in 2020 and beat Annoying Orange.
Instead of focusing on semantic bullstuff, maybe these pinpoint areas would be something to talk about.
I live in a highly conservative area, and I know that this is one of the key issues I hear more than anything.
Basically, if you focused on BS like this, and did so as a 3rd party, you may gain the largest 3rd party voting traction
ever. Just make sure to point out that Wal-mart treats fines like fees.
https://www.nytimes.com/1993/08/24/business/wal-mart-on-trial-on-predatory-pricing-charges.htmlhttp://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-high-cost-of-low-prices-2/Wal-mart is intent on creating a monopoly by force, likely implementing a puppet duopoly.
Speaking of Puppet Duopolys/Duopoly Deals. Focusing on how ISPs use an unethical 2-company
strategy in which one company has low prices and poor quality service, and the other has expensive prices and decent service, would
also do well in a 2020 presidential run. These Companies use bullying tactics to force ultimatums on customers and is ultimately going to
hurt the economy.
Wal-mart enters an area, kills it's competitors, killing their jobs, creating themselves to be the only store like it in the area.
This proceeds, with Wal-marts obvious bias toward focusing on part-time hiring, which ends up killing the wal-mart in it of itself in the end.
ISPs force users to put up with crap internet that they can afford, or dish out money to get a decent internet connection.
There needs to law enforcing both a Fair Sale System, and a 3 strike offense system to put an end to Wal-Mart's illegally low pricing.
I know it's hard to accept, but paying a little bit more will get rid of this poverty cycle that is hitting in many areas across america.
If we can't rely on laws to do this, I'm afraid it's a lost cause because people are adamant on giving in when everyone else is.
