[NEWS] antifa member got hit so hard he is now officially handicapped

Poll

Does this count as self defense?

yes
17 (85%)
no (cuck)
3 (15%)

Total Members Voted: 20

Voting closed: July 22, 2018, 11:51:23 PM

Author Topic: [NEWS] antifa member got hit so hard he is now officially handicapped  (Read 4236 times)

antifa are just terrorists now just arrest them

It's not legally self defense because a baton isnt a deadly weapon nor is it possible to tell who the initial aggressor was.

So he's suppose to let the guy with the baton hit him because it's not "self defense"

Get the forget outta here.

You're the reason why most self defense laws are bullstuff. Like in New Jersey if a man comes at you with a sword, you cannot shoot them. You have to use "equal power"

had the ability to flee but decided not to on personal reasons.

He was defending innocent people getting hit in the back WITH loving BATONS.

that white supremacists guy

He's not a loving white supremacist, do you hear yourself? You sound like a loving antifa SJW.

Get the forget outta here.

It's loving obvious you have a biased agenda at play.

It's not legally self defense because a baton isnt a deadly weapon nor is it possible to tell who the initial aggressor was.

https://definitions.uslegal.com/d/deadly-weapon/
A deadly weapon is generally defined as a firearm or anything manifestly designed, made, or adapted for the purposes of inflicting death or serious physical injury.

Also that was clearly a street fight and both parties were intentionally aggressors and either one had the ability to flee but decided not to on personal reasons.
You're the type of dipstuff that probably agrees with the mentality of the "no tolerance" policies in schools. The "Why didn't he just pause the fight and tell a cop" mentalities are reliant on an unrealistic expectation of reality. If he had run all he would have done is made himself more vulnerable.

He'll probably be sued up the ass instead of arrested.
This is true, and it's bullstuff. He may even win the lawsuit, but end up forgeted for the rest of his life.
Last I checked brain damage is pretty expensive so that white supremacists guy will probably have his life ruined anyways by the million dollar settlement he's gonna have to make in court
< White Supremacists Guy.
Do you really actually believe everyone who isn't one Side X is a white supremacist?

No tolerance policies at school hurt the victim more than the bully.

In fact most of the time the bully receives no punishment.

It's not legally self defense because a baton isnt a deadly weapon nor is it possible to tell who the initial aggressor was. Also that was clearly a street fight and both parties were intentionally aggressors and either one had the ability to flee but decided not to on personal reasons. He'll probably be sued up the ass instead of arrested. Last I checked brain damage is pretty expensive so that white supremacists guy will probably have his life ruined anyways by the million dollar settlement he's gonna have to make in court

Jeez Perry. Your an incel AND a commie?

Do you really actually believe everyone who isn't one Side X is a white supremacist?
I'm only guessing because Lord Tony explained that he was a white supremacist national socialist

You're the type of dipstuff that probably agrees with the mentality of the "no tolerance" policies in schools. The "Why didn't he just pause the fight and tell a cop" mentalities are reliant on an unrealistic expectation of reality. If he had run all he would have done is made himself more vulnerable.
This is true, and it's bullstuff. He may even win the lawsuit, but end up forgeted for the rest of his life.
I don't know where you got any of this stuff or why you're coming at me but both parties were legally attacking each other instead of voluntarily fleeing which means that neither of them had the right to self defense at all. It has absolutely nothing to do with their alignment or anything. If the antifa forgeter won the fight and the right guy got brain damage it would literally be the same charges because both parties were aggressors

You're clearly trying to delude yourself into thinking that the guy on the right was standing his ground and fighting in his defense but in actuality he was fully involved in this massive street fight as an actual aggressor, just like antifa stick guy
« Last Edit: July 15, 2018, 06:21:08 PM by thegoodperry »

if the antifa guy was the one who won the fight, then he would be arrested and put in jail since he's on the illegal side

Do you really actually believe everyone who isn't one Side X is a white supremacist?
member of antifa was about to smack some crazy big white supremicist national socialist with his baton of justice.
??????

if the antifa guy was the one who won the fight, then he would be arrested and put in jail since he's on the illegal side
it's not illegal to be an antifa member in Portland. so no, as far as the current evidence is concerned, both parties have the same legal disposition

I don't know why you think any specific person there is more or less illegal than the other when there's a huge mutually fueled street brawl going on lol
« Last Edit: July 15, 2018, 06:26:42 PM by thegoodperry »

the winners write the history books

it's not illegal to be an antifa member in Portland. so no, as far as the current evidence is concerned, both parties have the same legal disposition
I never said being one is illegal lol

Antifa dude was attacking people unlawfully with a baton

If the Antifa guy won the fight, it wouldn't be ruled self defense, it'd be ruled assault or some form most likely

I never said being one is illegal lol

Antifa dude was attacking people unlawfully with a baton

If the Antifa guy won the fight, it wouldn't be ruled self defense, it'd be ruled assault or some form most likely
the guy on the right was attacking people unlawfully with his fists. That's just as illegal as using a baton

the guy on the right was attacking people unlawfully with his fists. That's just as illegal as using a baton
explain how him defending himself is unlawful