Grammar national socialists: How far would they take a grammatical error?

Author Topic: Grammar national socialists: How far would they take a grammatical error?  (Read 9154 times)

so in other words tony is cnn


You told me to show you proof.

And ironically they misspelled chief while talking about the covfefe spelling mistake by Annoying Orange.
i mean i dunno if you can call that a spelling mistake but it’s hilarious nonetheless

tiny just quadposted
thats gonna be a yikes


i mean i dunno if you can call that a spelling mistake but it’s hilarious nonetheless

It's chief not cheif.

at the same time they knew what I meant anyways.

unless they want to admit they can't make the connection int heir head.
they wouldnt spam if they cares about the topic

they wouldnt spam if they cares about the topic

Nah they don't care about the topic.

They just want to talk about the typo and stuff all over the place.

should you punch grammar national socialists

you should punch grammar national socialists


id totally punch a grammar national socialist for sure like just lemme speak the way i want to >:(

Holy stuff, lol.

I'm so glad he decided to quote all my legitimate points about how his typo might not have been obvious.
This drama was over from the start. What gold.

Have you heard of nika before?

Have you  heard of nike before?

It's easy to figre it out