The rampant child research problem of twitter. (serious)

Author Topic: The rampant child research problem of twitter. (serious)  (Read 4394 times)

so what you're saying is that we need to genocide the portuguese and the phillipinos?

thats exactly what we should do brother

If child enthusiasm ever becomes acceptable in the same way as gay is i swear ill go commit sodoku

btw to be clear i dont mean that being gay is wrong
well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
except creepphillia is wrong

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.

Elaborate

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.

what did he mean by this?

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
why do you keep saying these things

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
Homoloveuality is a loveuality.

child enthusiasm is not.

what the forget are you getting at.

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
we get it you hate gays because the old testament says so

anyone who says homoloveuality is wrong was probably inappropriately touched by a priest at a young age and has developed family values as a defense mechanism against their troubled past

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
yea yea handicap baby go play wit ur star trek toys smh

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
creeploveual 0_0

well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
its morally acceptable for me to ravage your starfish after you've spouted this dumbass stuff
« Last Edit: January 01, 2019, 10:14:05 PM by HULKHOGANWWFWORLDCHAMPION »


well when you take this kind of approach, it opens the door to whether or not child enthusiasm is wrong (when you accept homoloveuality as a morally permissible practice). it's a slippery slope.
bruh moment