Mainstream Media defends child enthusiasts

Poll

Well, the time has come. Choose.

Be a child enthusiast or child enthusiast Sympathizer.
6 (33.3%)
Be Conservative.
12 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 18

Author Topic: Mainstream Media defends child enthusiasts  (Read 2746 times)


you're a national socialist now?

you're a national socialist now?
According to the media, I guess so.

It's a choice between that or being a child enthusiast.

you openly admit to being a national socialist because you're angry at CNN?

you openly admit to being a national socialist because you're angry at CNN?
I never called myself a national socialist, I never wanted to make such claims.
The media has pushed this on me.

If I have to choose between being a national socialist or being a child enthusiast, I'm not going to be a child enthusiast.
Period.

and you're willing to defend national socialists because they aren't child enthusiasts?

and you're willing to defend national socialists because they aren't child enthusiasts?
The media has made it clear, there is no middle ground.
There is "them and us."

Under normal circumstances, I'd prefer not to have either.

But If I choose neither, I will be declared both.

And given that the media delcares everyone they don't like as "national socialists" and "alt-right" while child enthusiasts get this kind of treatment.

You can stand there on your moral high ground.

But the media has redefined the term national socialist to mean

American
Patriotic
Not-Left
Not-Leftist
Not-creepphillic

The national socialist you're thinking of is part of the old term. They wanted to redefine racism to mean "institutional power" and not discrimination based on race.
But they also inadvertently redefined the term national socialist.

This is the hill the media has chosen to die on.

Then don't be surprised when this happens more and more.

I will never loving defend a child enthusiast. But the media has made it clear, national socialists of today aren't 1940s national socialists. And the word will never mean that again.
It will to those not in the know, but as this goes off the rails, those not in the know will quickly be tasked with the choice by colleagues and others.

Time and time again, we've been treated with terms like "national socialist" and "tribal" for standing for basic things.

We've gone from "Wax my balls, bigot" to "if you're against this film, you're a national socialist."
The film is clear and blatant child enthusiasm.

But the term national socialist and tribal has become a scare word to keep people from saying what needs to be said.

And the fact you're looking, even now, for me to say the magic words proves to me you're part of the cancel culture forgeters too.


forget you, I've made my choice, No matter what fear tactics and submissive things you wish to pull I'm done.

If I'm a national socialist for standing against child enthusiasm, I am.
If I'm a tribal for standing against blatant segregation, I am.

forget your fear tactics, and forget you.

lol matthew so feisty mmmmmm wild creature mmm

something tells me you're covering up for something, baby boy


tldr:
Fine, from now on:
If I'm a national socialist, you're a child enthusiast.

If I'm a tribal, you're a segregationist.


literally everyone is mad at the film dawg

journalism is stuff

If I'm a tribal, you're a segregationist.
its hilarious to me that these are two different things for you

its hilarious to me that these are two different things for you
Not to me.
I'd consider them the same.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.detroitnews.com/amp/5765127002
The media on the otherhand, would label me tribal for calling out these blatantly segregationist ideas.

Anti racism is not void of racism.
Anti racism is the use of historically tribal actions on the inverse races.

Anti racism is to racism
What counter-clockwise (anti-clockwise for the UK) is to clockwise.