Author Topic: The White House Hunger Games: ThErE aRe No EpStEiN fILeS  (Read 82296 times)

you are THE RAPED the day of the rope is coming for YOU we will DEPORt you

no... not charlie kirk... my father figure... he did politics the right way... he was a centrist... he took the wokes opinions in good faith... but we wont anymore...

i doubt robinson is a patsy (they certainly wouldve chosen a vocally anti israel shooter lol) and maybe he even did do it, but you have to be a total rube to take the fbi-released evidence at face value when its comprised of:
- a letter, destroyed but somehow 'reconstructed' by the fbi in a day without details
- text messages admitted to be 'recreations' whatever that means (which seemingly were just written to summarize the official story and not actually based on anything at all)
- normie engravements on casings for bullets which were never found
it's brazenly malpractice and plainly false. moreover the fbi's main intention is not to have robinson convicted, but rather to justify their greater political actions, and they're willing to accept the easiest mistrial case ever to do this. discussing the case altogether as if it's a matter of facts rather than rhetoric is a total waste. forget glowies lol
« Last Edit: Today at 01:55:51 AM by Drydess »

Conservatism is the least brave thing you can be, because at its core it is an ideology built around clinging to the status quo and fearing change. It is not about courage or conviction, but about comfort. To be conservative is to say, "I do not want the world to change, even if the world needs to." It is to mistake familiarity for stability and to confuse tradition with truth. There is nothing bold about wanting things to stay the same in a world that demands growth, compassion, and progress to survive. The real bravery lies in questioning what we have been told, in breaking cycles of harm, and in daring to imagine that something better is possible.

It is also the laziest ideology, because it asks nothing of the believer beyond obedience. It takes no effort to say "things were better before" or "we should go back." It takes no creativity, no empathy, and no intellectual honesty to defend systems that already hold power over others. Conservatism thrives on repetition, on inherited opinions, on slogans that were written decades before the speaker was even born. To be conservative is to live someone else's idea of how the world should work, rather than to think for yourself about how it could.

When you peel back all the rhetoric about tradition, faith, or patriotism, conservatism is little more than a refusal to grow up. It is a child's grip on the familiar toy, insisting that no one else touch it and that no new games be played. Progressivism, on the other hand, is the adult understanding that life changes whether you like it or not, and that maturity means facing that reality with grace, compassion, and imagination. The future will come either way. The only real question is whether you will help build it or spend your life pretending the past was perfect.

As John Stuart Mill once put it, "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." Mill's point was not just an insult but a diagnosis. It is far easier to be ruled by fear and habit than by reason and curiosity. To challenge the way things are demands effort. To simply defend them demands only loyalty. Progress is the work of active minds, while reaction is the instinct of idle ones.

Friedrich Nietzsche warned against this moral stagnation, writing that "he who cannot command himself will obey." Conservatism thrives on this obedience, a surrender to authority dressed up as moral virtue. It teaches people to obey tradition, obey hierarchy, obey the myth of "how it has always been." Nietzsche's point was that true strength comes from creating new values, not clinging to old ones. The conservative mind fears chaos, but in doing so, it also fears creation itself.

Even Socrates, long before the term "conservative" existed, understood the danger of unexamined tradition. "The unexamined life is not worth living," he said, and yet the conservative project depends entirely on leaving life unexamined. It resists the uncomfortable questions that might expose injustice or demand self-reflection. Philosophy, art, and science all advance because someone dared to ask, "Why do we do it this way?" Conservatism, by contrast, ends that sentence early: "We do it this way."

And Jean-Paul Sartre said it best: "Freedom is what you do with what has been done to you." To be conservative is to deny that freedom, to choose the comfort of repetition over the burden of responsibility. To be progressive is to take what has been done, face it honestly, and decide to do better. One path builds a future. The other embalms the past and calls it tradition.

That's the kicker, too. They've eroded the culture so much they don't even need to be subtle about it anymore. You can go on stage and fundraise off your husband's death, despite inheriting his $10mil.

It's all a grift. Humble Water Filter Merchant will spout off in one sentence how the Democrats are child enthusiasts which is why it's ok to send in the national guard on citizens, then the next breath go into an ad read about methylene blue.

Walsh sells books, Crowder does speaking tours, Kirk debated college kids. They're doing it for money, not because they care about you or a cause, but because idiots on the right will give hard earned money to the cult cause your handlers told you to be angry. It'd be laughable if it weren't so sad.

Oh and this. Even if you don't want to address the philosophical errors of the ideology, you must at least realize the media ecosystem they've created is designed to get as much money out of their followers as possible. It's the cookie meme: