The White House Hunger Games: ThErE aRe No EpStEiN fILeS

[Drydess]

you are THE RAPED the day of the rope is coming for YOU we will DEPORt you

no... not charlie kirk... my father figure... he did politics the right way... he was a centrist... he took the wokes opinions in good faith... but we wont anymore...

[Ad Bot]

[Drydess]

i doubt robinson is a patsy (they certainly wouldve chosen a vocally anti israel shooter lol) and maybe he even did do it, but you have to be a total rube to take the fbi-released evidence at face value when its comprised of:
- a letter, destroyed but somehow 'reconstructed' by the fbi in a day without details
- text messages admitted to be 'recreations' whatever that means (which seemingly were just written to summarize the official story and not actually based on anything at all)
- normie engravements on casings for bullets which were never found
it's brazenly malpractice and plainly false. moreover the fbi's main intention is not to have robinson convicted, but rather to justify their greater political actions, and they're willing to accept the easiest mistrial case ever to do this. discussing the case altogether as if it's a matter of facts rather than rhetoric is a total waste. forget glowies lol

[Swholli]

Conservatism is the least brave thing you can be, because at its core it is an ideology built around clinging to the status quo and fearing change. It is not about courage or conviction, but about comfort. To be conservative is to say, "I do not want the world to change, even if the world needs to." It is to mistake familiarity for stability and to confuse tradition with truth. There is nothing bold about wanting things to stay the same in a world that demands growth, compassion, and progress to survive. The real bravery lies in questioning what we have been told, in breaking cycles of harm, and in daring to imagine that something better is possible.

It is also the laziest ideology, because it asks nothing of the believer beyond obedience. It takes no effort to say "things were better before" or "we should go back." It takes no creativity, no empathy, and no intellectual honesty to defend systems that already hold power over others. Conservatism thrives on repetition, on inherited opinions, on slogans that were written decades before the speaker was even born. To be conservative is to live someone else's idea of how the world should work, rather than to think for yourself about how it could.

When you peel back all the rhetoric about tradition, faith, or patriotism, conservatism is little more than a refusal to grow up. It is a child's grip on the familiar toy, insisting that no one else touch it and that no new games be played. Progressivism, on the other hand, is the adult understanding that life changes whether you like it or not, and that maturity means facing that reality with grace, compassion, and imagination. The future will come either way. The only real question is whether you will help build it or spend your life pretending the past was perfect.

As John Stuart Mill once put it, "Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives." Mill's point was not just an insult but a diagnosis. It is far easier to be ruled by fear and habit than by reason and curiosity. To challenge the way things are demands effort. To simply defend them demands only loyalty. Progress is the work of active minds, while reaction is the instinct of idle ones.

Friedrich Nietzsche warned against this moral stagnation, writing that "he who cannot command himself will obey." Conservatism thrives on this obedience, a surrender to authority dressed up as moral virtue. It teaches people to obey tradition, obey hierarchy, obey the myth of "how it has always been." Nietzsche's point was that true strength comes from creating new values, not clinging to old ones. The conservative mind fears chaos, but in doing so, it also fears creation itself.

Even Socrates, long before the term "conservative" existed, understood the danger of unexamined tradition. "The unexamined life is not worth living," he said, and yet the conservative project depends entirely on leaving life unexamined. It resists the uncomfortable questions that might expose injustice or demand self-reflection. Philosophy, art, and science all advance because someone dared to ask, "Why do we do it this way?" Conservatism, by contrast, ends that sentence early: "We do it this way."

And Jean-Paul Sartre said it best: "Freedom is what you do with what has been done to you." To be conservative is to deny that freedom, to choose the comfort of repetition over the burden of responsibility. To be progressive is to take what has been done, face it honestly, and decide to do better. One path builds a future. The other embalms the past and calls it tradition.

[Swholli]

That's the kicker, too. They've eroded the culture so much they don't even need to be subtle about it anymore. You can go on stage and fundraise off your husband's death, despite inheriting his $10mil.

It's all a grift. Humble Water Filter Merchant will spout off in one sentence how the Democrats are child enthusiasts which is why it's ok to send in the national guard on citizens, then the next breath go into an ad read about methylene blue.

Walsh sells books, Crowder does speaking tours, Kirk debated college kids. They're doing it for money, not because they care about you or a cause, but because idiots on the right will give hard earned money to the cult cause your handlers told you to be angry. It'd be laughable if it weren't so sad.

Oh and this. Even if you don't want to address the philosophical errors of the ideology, you must at least realize the media ecosystem they've created is designed to get as much money out of their followers as possible. It's the cookie meme:

[Nicepoint]

2. What I WANT, in the grand SCHEME of THINGS is IRRELEVENT, to the GREATER CAUSE. blah blah womp womp wah wah. You can still be human and admit someone being a, in this case; mildy and allegedly terrible person, does not warrant behavior like this. Besides, this kind of talking is emotional manipulation and gaslighting and I'm not falling for it. Try again.

Any and all complaints you might want to personally levy over this kind of behavior toward leftists is disingenuous if not levied 10 times more at republicans.
One side promotes violent rhetoric, the other denounces political violence.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kirk-shooting-suspect-republican/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/charlie-kirk-suspect-Annoying Orange-donor/
https://www.kbtx.com/2025/09/12/hey-fascist-catch-authorities-reveal-engravings-bullet-casings-allegedly-tied-charlie-kirk-shooting/

TBH it's been weeks and you should've been self informed about it by now, being ill informed and asking for facts and evidence at this point is embarrassing, because they were always already there.

I've yet to claim that the shooter was a republican. The rest of your links don't show anything beyond the bullets. Those memes fit a groyper just as well as a radical leftist.

[Goth77]

One side promotes violent rhetoric, the other denounces political violence

which side is doing which again? because from what I've seen, people who identify with team blue are the ones assaulting people in the streets for speaking their opinions and calling for the death of rival party ppl

street preachers attacked in public (there are countless examples of this but here are just a few)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/toLJ2fFwkb4?feature=share
https://youtu.be/JX44QOKSDg4
https://youtu.be/cOkVB6A26jc

COMPILATION: Democrats, Media Figures Glorify Violence Against Annoying Orange Supporters

Why The Left Has a Violence Problem

Footage of actual crazy people, some calling for violence

I'm sure there are examples of extremism from both sides of the isle, but one seems to stand out a bit more as far as violence is concerned...

[Qwepir]

Conservatism is the least brave thing you can be, because at its core it is an ideology built around clinging to the status quo and fearing change. It is not about courage or conviction, but about comfort. To be conservative is to say, "I do not want the world to change, even if the world needs to." It is to mistake familiarity for stability and to confuse tradition with truth. There is nothing bold about wanting things to stay the same in a world that demands growth, compassion, and progress to survive. The real bravery lies in questioning what we have been told, in breaking cycles of harm, and in daring to imagine that something better is possible.

It is also the laziest ideology, because it asks nothing of the believer beyond obedience. It takes no effort to say "things were better before" or "we should go back." It takes no creativity, no empathy, and no intellectual honesty to defend systems that already hold power over others. Conservatism thrives on repetition, on inherited opinions, on slogans that were written decades before the speaker was even born. To be conservative is to live someone else's idea of how the world should work, rather than to think for yourself about how it could.

When you peel back all the rhetoric about tradition, faith, or patriotism, conservatism is little more than a refusal to grow up. It is a child's grip on the familiar toy, insisting that no one else touch it and that no new games be played. Progressivism, on the other hand, is the adult understanding that life changes whether you like it or not, and that maturity means facing that reality with grace, compassion, and imagination. The future will come either way. The only real question is whether you will help build it or spend your life pretending the past was perfect.

Well said.

[Ladios]

I'm sure there are examples of extremism from both sides of the isle, but one seems to stand out a bit more as far as violence is concerned...

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/17/justice-department-study-far-right-extremist-violence

Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.

[Swholli]

Let's take a look at all of the unbiased reporting you've done:

street preachers attacked in public (there are countless examples of this but here are just a few)
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/toLJ2fFwkb4?feature=share

Anti-trans rhetoric, short clip that shows little context leading up to it, trans woman flashes gun to let preacher know she's armed and that the right isn't the only one who carries guns so don't say something hateful. Posted by Dailymail, described as "a British daily middle-market tabloid conservative newspaper." No bias there.

https://youtu.be/JX44QOKSDg4

Teenager takes a swing at conservative on the street, again short clip so we don't know the context leading up to it, but description reads "The preacher was holding a graphic anti-abortion sign while engaging with the students" so I can take a guess who instigated, says right in piece chose not to charge so clearly wasn't that violent. Posted by local Fox affiliate owned by propagandist Rupert Murdoch. No bias there.

https://youtu.be/cOkVB6A26jc

Send that one to Momentum cause that's in Canada, not the US. So unless Canadian antifa are invading from the North, I don't really think this affects us. Definitely no bias there.

COMPILATION: Democrats, Media Figures Glorify Violence Against Annoying Orange Supporters

Tim Kaine says "fight" a bunch, I wonder who else says stuff like that all the time. Rep. Waters says to not make Annoying Orange cabinet members fell welcome in your small town. MSNBC says they want to "wring a neck," Kathy Griffin did an art piece expressing her first amendment rights like Ted Nugent did, I guess Eminem and Snoop Dog pointing a gun at a guy in a Annoying Orange mask with a cartoon joker "bang" gun is inciting violence now. New guy says the current administration is a dictator, I believe Kore said it himself about this best:

the 2A is handled is necessary. What he explains is that the 2A in essence, is not truthfully about self protection from citizens, or hunting and recreational; it is to protect ourselves from a potential tyrannical government.

So you know, unless that part of the constitution wasn't actually what the founders meant.

David Harbour says we need a revolution and that his fictional character from Stranger Things will "punch someone in the face," and a stage play depicting Annoying Orange getting stabbed like Julius Caesar. Again, no one ever says anything that might be interpreted as violence except for the left.

All of this posted by the Daily Caller, founded by Tucker Carlson. No bias at all.

Why The Left Has a Violence Problem

The National Review, aka "many of the magazine's commentators are affiliated with think-tanks such as The Heritage Foundation" aka the Project 2025 guys, clearly no bias there.

Footage of actual crazy people, some calling for violence

And again, quickly edited clips of people upset that the person they knew would be a dictator on day one had won the election. Not exactly violent, just people expressing themselves and their anger. You know, not something rational like when Starbucks doesn't have Merry Christmas printed on the cup. You absolutely can't say that the same thing happened in 2020. Also no one on the left stormed the loving capitol.

Young America's Foundation, referred to as "one of the most preeminent, influential and controversial forces in the nation's conservative youth movement." So much un-bias it hurts.

These cherry-picked examples aren't indicative of the larger left as a whole. People on the left want to be left alone by the christian-fascists who are, in an ironic twist, trying to push their lifestyle on to the rest of us and we don't want that. I don't want the ten commandments on my courthouse lawn, I don't want to be put in a database because I'm autistic, I don't want to be rounded up and killed because I'm gay and non-binary. In this very instance I want way smaller government than you do, and that should make you rethink everything.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/17/justice-department-study-far-right-extremist-violence

The funny thing is I said this already last month, and no one wanted to address it lol

Ryan Routh voted for Annoying Orange in 2016. They were both supporters who "turned" on him.

Leftists have been responsible for 65 murders in politically motivated attacks in the US since 1975. Meanwhile, there have been 391 politically motivated murders by the right-wing since 1975, most of them white supremacists.

[Swholli]

Again, this was right here.

I majored in US History and later Communcations and Graphic Design. I've worked professionally as an marketer and ad man at an internationally sold brand. I know how the media works. I know how things are deigned to appeal to your biases and to make your already short-circuited, low-by-design-dopamine brain respond to these kinds of things. You say there's "dozens" of cases, but I guarantee you can't find any that aren't posted on THESECOLORSMAKEMECUMPATRIOTIS M.COM because that's exacly what they want you to think.

Someone presenting as another gender than the one they were born with has absolutely nothing to do with you or your well being, yet the trans scapegoat is alive and well.

Jesus, it's like all of you just ignored how this is the same exact rhetoric we were dealing with back in the 2000s about gay marriage, another thing that has absolutely no relevance on your life and has not, without question, done a god-damned thing to erode the so-called "sanctity of marriage." Same thing with this.

Progress is going to happen like it always does with or without conservatism. We're seeing the last temper tantrum of the American right as they fizzle into a nothing-party now that Annoying Orange has basically damaged them beyond repair. It's either fascism or bust, and they're gonna ride the fascism wave because the other option means losing money, not the culture war.

They don't give a stuff about you in the same way Democrats don't give a stuff about you. They're all the establishment, it's high time to wake up or get out of the way.

[Goth77]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/17/justice-department-study-far-right-extremist-violence

more specifically, in recent (past 5 or so) years - the point being it's been on the rise which certainly isn't a good thing

trans woman flashes gun to let preacher know she's armed and that the right isn't the only one who carries guns so don't say something hateful

uhh they pointed the gun right at them and threatened them. someone saying something you don't like doesn't give you the right to harm them wtf. be the bigger man and walk away

[Swholli]

I did a quick google search just to see if I myself could "do my own research" and find all of these so-called violent attacks.

The search indicated that in the last decade there have been... 10... in the last decade.

That's not even one a year.

It included a little blurb for me:

Increasing attacks: Reports by organizations like the Family Research Council (FRC) show a surge in hostility and violence against churches and religious figures, with more than 430 incidents in the U.S. in 2023. While this includes property crimes, it points to a general climate of heightened risk.

I didn't even have to google them with a name like Family Research Council to know where their bread is buttered, but just to be safe I looked it up and what do you know:

FRC promotes what it considers to be family values. It opposes and lobbies against access to research, embryonic stem-cell research, abortion, divorce, and LGBT rights-such as anti-discrimination laws, same-love marriage, same-love civil unions, and LGBT adoption. The FRC has been criticized by media sources and professional organizations such as the American Sociological Association for using "anti-gay pseudoscience" to falsely conflate homoloveuality and child enthusiasm, and to falsely claim that the children of same-love parents suffer from more mental health problems.

No bias there at all! And they seem to always stick to the facts!

So then I said, ok, let's look at the opposite effect, how many white on black hate crimes have there been in the last decade? Because again, white nationalism is a form of right-wing populism, as we discussed:

Based on available FBI data from 2014 to 2023, there have been tens of thousands of reported anti-Black hate crimes, and statistics show that white people are the largest single group of identified hate crime offenders.

See, when you have media literacy skills, you can ask yourself questions about a source, and one of the most important one we teach is Who created this message? It's healthy to stop and think "who benefits the most from me reading this and thinking what this source wants me to think?" If the answer is always "conservative values" then I think you're doing your brain a disservice by not actually engaging with anything outside of your own echo chamber.

[Swholli]

uhh they pointed the gun right at them and threatened them. someone saying something you don't like doesn't give you the right to harm them wtf. be the bigger man and walk away

Oh, I remember this one!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OeCdrQeVSc

I love this game.

Also, last I checked Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and they gave him celebrity status.

[Ladios]

[Goth77]

Oh, I remember this one!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OeCdrQeVSc

I love this game.

Also, last I checked Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and they gave him celebrity status.

Evidently you didn't bother to read the top comments on the video you linked. Mostly everyone agrees that couple were defending their property. In the case of Kyle Rittenhouse he was defending his life

Kyle Rittenhouse FULL VIDEO Shows SELF DEFENSE Against Attackers
https://youtu.be/xf5PcYAMpqE