How can I be "still fail" if I wasn't fail before? Generally the correct way to do it is to say "fail", then they make a stuffty counter-argument(see: your entire life) and you say "still fail".
1. and?
2. you said you were working on it, not that you had fixed saving and uploading. So yours breaks it too.
3. True, but again, pointless.
4. I have not seen this but it probably does. It is, however, pointless to note this.
5. Be specific. Although I fear you mean that you've been doing things that will be in the next version of TDM anyways.
Also, "raw release"?
You're getting so worked up over making sure you port a mod correctly when its going to be outdated soon. Shouldn't you be working on your dying battlefield mod?
No, you got me wrong on "Still Fail", I only meant the other ports. Sorry if you got me wrong.
1. I consider this as an important feature to be running
2. Mine doesn't break, as it's working, I'm not just finalizing everything yet.
3. It'll be a convenience
4. I know. I'm just saying it. Lol
5. I mean like, for example: the onConnect package. It still exists in their ports. As doing so will result to failure.
I meant on "raw release" as in public release last year ago, I call them "raw" as they come untouched by any other modder, but only the author himself/herself.
I'm not focusing entirely on this port. I just wanted it to work correctly for the meantime, as you mentioned "dying" Battlefield mod (I kept saying it already, its NOT A MOD, its a
content pack. Containing
few weapons, vehicles, and builds. Don't worry, I'm working on something that will lessen the download), it needs to work with Space's TDM, as any other TDM mod out there is owned by Space's.
