Author Topic: Darkest of Days  (Read 1431 times)

Just played the demo on Steam.

loving amazing.

Discuss.

I loved it, but a lot of the voice acting was really bad.

I'm sure a lot people hated it, but I just loved the concept and gameplay of it.

I loved it, but a lot of the voice acting was really bad.

I'm sure a lot people hated it, but I just loved the concept and gameplay of it.
Yeah, some dialogue was a little awkward.

The whole concept was confusing at first. The shooting is superb though, I love the fast-reload trick you can do.

Just played the demo on Steam.

loving amazing.

Discuss.
umm details please


umm details please

umm look it up yourself please.

Then again, don't bother. It's horrible.

After reading Yuki's critic i want to play it.  :cookieMonster:

Yuki is right, I got all goose-bumps when reading about it in game informer, it's a good concept but the game is either you love it or hate it.

First off this was made by a brand new game company. The graphics do not fit a "Next-Gen" title. So many glitches, the reload system is glitched. if you start to reload a gun then switch to another one and switch back, that gun already reloads. If you crouch then press start and resume game you're stuck in crouch. Voice acting sounds like they where in a small room with a horse loving their ass. And we can't forget invisible walls. In like the first Civil war mission you come to a rebel signal house and your guys are like, "We can sneak up through up through this hill." So they start walking up the hill, and you follow and what do you know Invisible wall, everyone else can pass but you.

Story line blows, "OH HAY IM FRUM DA CIVIL WAR." Then he picks up a bolt-action rifle and knows how to operate it like the back of his hand.

The only good things about this is the fact that the reload system was a nice feature, and the easy achievements.

The company that made this had to lay off half of the Dev team because sales blew ass.

Rekuddo, I'm not going to address all of your points, but the game doesn't have to be perfect to be fun.

Several glitchy games have been fun, and I just so happen to like this game. The reloading is pretty cool, it's either you do it without error, or you wait a few extra seconds because it jammed.

The storyline doesn't blow, it's somewhat decent. What I got from it is that there are certain people back in time that are needed to help with a problem that's going on in the future. Just because he's back from the 1700s doesn't mean he doesn't know how to pick up a gun, and figure it out. You wouldn't need to be a head-chef to use an oven.

The game itself is fun, but it has some faults. If you don't like the faults, don't play it.

I'm just saying, I do enjoy the game and I'm playing it over again to get the achievements.

The gun part could have easily been solved with a few lines of dialog for example

Dexter: "Alright, this rifle isn't like your Springfield musket, after every shot you must pull back the bolt and push forward again to load. After 5 rounds insert more rounds like so."

The glitches don't render the game unplayable, they're just annoying and pop up at the wrong times.

I do however liked how they patched up how people from the past help out more of history, How just people listed as MIAs.

umm look it up yourself please.

Then again, don't bother. It's horrible.
The topic maker should always have at least two links, one for game-play, and one for the website.

The topic maker should always have at least two links, one for game-play, and one for the website.
And thats why your topics have that.


The topic maker should always have at least two links, one for game-play, and one for the website.

Hi there! I'm Google.

Just type whatever you need to find on the Internet in my nifty little search box and hit the button below it that says "Google Search".

but the game doesn't have to be perfect to be fun.

Of course not, but it's so imperfect it's not fun at all. I honestly tried my hardest to see it as fun, but it couldn't have been more boring.