Recolorable Glass on Default Windows

[Tophius]

I like this idea better

I agree. This would also allow for other players to view them.

[Ad Bot]

[Space Guy]

Well, that's exactly the one I described. I'm still not sure how you'd save it, though.

[Niliscro]

Well, that's exactly the one I described. I'm still not sure how you'd save it, though.

Thus the cookie monster.
And I think it would save fine, seeing how JVS bricks don't lose their color or anything when they're saved/loaded.

[Tophius]

Well, that's exactly the one I described. I'm still not sure how you'd save it, though.

Oops, I thought Niliscro was referring to both your comments, favouring them over mine. :p

[Space Guy]

Thus the cookie monster.
And I think it would save fine, seeing how JVS bricks don't lose their color or anything when they're saved/loaded.

JVS Content saves it by having the content shape the same colour as the brick. If you have the two different, only the brick's colour will save.

[Truce]

JVS Content saves it by having the content shape the same colour as the brick. If you have the two different, only the brick's colour will save.

You could put the color ID in the print ID variable of the frame so that it saves it that way? The frames wouldn't have prints anyway, of course.

[Niliscro]

Bump.

[chilmans]

Bump.

you also can make 2 seperate bricks of it. A window-plane brick and a window-frame brick. Then you could paint them seperately

[Niliscro]

you also can make 2 seperate bricks of it. A window-plane brick and a window-frame brick. Then you could paint them seperately

That would involve placing a brick inside a brick, I believe.

[Chrono]

Well, that's exactly the one I described. I'm still not sure how you'd save it, though.

It could be two different bricks. The frame automatically plants the pane, and when either of them are destroyed, both are destroyed. And have the frame not load the pane if the bricks were loaded and not planted.

[Wizard]

That would involve placing a brick inside a brick, I believe.

Better get Chuck Norris in here.

Ontopic: Good idea, would be useful. :)

[Chrono]

That would involve placing a brick inside a brick, I believe.

Entirely possible.

[Truce]

Bricks in bricks can cause some weird errors though. So if you use a static shape,

You could put the color ID in the print ID variable of the frame so that it saves it that way? The frames wouldn't have prints anyway, of course.

[Chrono]

Ah I suppose you're right, however static shapes lag more than using fxdtsbricks.

[Truce]

Ah I suppose you're right, however static shapes lag more than using fxdtsbricks.

Then they'd have to limit theirselves, just like they do with JVS.