I told my mom I Converted

[Zenthrox]

But if you're having recreational love, with birth control, how is it any different than gay love? You could say having love with birth control is unnatural as well, but nobody seems to complain about that.

You want to argue over recreational love now? In recreational love, there's still the chance of pregnancy, which separates it from gay love.

There you go conveniently dodging my point again. Adopted children = orphaned. You seem to think that adopted children don't deserve the same rights as other children simply because the people that adopted them happen to be a same love couple.

Now I see what you're getting at. Again, I'm fine with two males or two females raising a child. I'm against gay intimacy.

No it doesn't. Married couples have "unproductive" love. Gay couples have "unproductive" love. I don't see where you get off saying there is a difference.

Married couples have love knowing there's a possibility of another child, while gay couples have love simply for pleasure. Two different scenarios.

Nothing is wrong with enjoying love, but there is a purpose for it. The reason I'm against gay intimacy is because it usually ends up with both parties being injured in some way with no lasting benefit, as opposed to straight couples who may at least get a child.

It is not another subject. Stop loving avoiding my points. Straight people are at just a big of risk of STDs as gay people. Being straight doesn't make you impervious to disease.

It is another subject. STDs and gay love are two different things. Straight people can get them while trying to make a child, while gay people can get it while giving themselves a few moments of pleasure and putting their health at risk.

lol

[Ad Bot]

[Inv3rted]

It is another subject. STDs and gay love are two different things. Straight people can get them while trying to make a child, while gay people can get it while giving themselves a few moments of pleasure and putting their health at risk.

You're acting like people only have love to make children.

Are you sure you live in society, or are you a hermit with satellite internet?

[yuki]

I hate it when people say "natural" or "unnatural". There's very few unnatural things that even exist. Human beings are nature, therefore everything we do is natural. Killing, eating, sleeping, destroying, creating, loving. How dare you have the audacity to proclaim what is or is not "natural" when you obviously have no loving clue.

Here's a common argument I hear all the time:
Other animals don't have gay love so it's unnatural!
You have to be ass-handicapped to think this is a point. Other animals don't have complex thoughts either. Hell, animals don't cook or clean their food, and even chimps EAT THEIR OWN YOUNG AT RANDOM. Inversely, Dolphins commit murder.

The reason I'm against gay intimacy is because it usually ends up with both parties being injured in some way with no lasting benefit, as opposed to straight couples who may at least get a child.

So you think all gay couples are just love-mongers? How about all the couples that ADOPT children, children ABANDONED by straight couples? What about a vasectomy or tubal ligation? Now it's just pleasure love, but then again they're straight so it's okay.

You're acting like people only have love to make children.

Are you sure you live in society, or are you a hermit with satellite internet?

No, he's just a narrow-minded idiot.

[Valen]

I only have love for the luls

[Skele]

Married couples have love knowing there's a possibility of another child, while gay couples have love simply for pleasure. Two different scenarios.

Nothing is wrong with enjoying love, but there is a purpose for it. The reason I'm against gay intimacy is because it usually ends up with both parties being injured in some way with no lasting benefit, as opposed to straight couples who may at least get a child.

How often do you think married couples have love? The majority of the time people have love is not to have a child. How sheltered are you?

Also, a child can more often times than not be a lasting issue from a having love, especially when both people having it aren't ready for one. To me, there are more risks having love as heteroloveuals.

[Osak]

I already did it to Madmitten before and he fell for it again. What a smutz.Yes it could, as in the way I intended and not by an oversensitive airhead.Now that's discrimination. Atheism isn't a trait that can be bred out. I guess it's only OK to not make fun of blacks since you are black yourself? Pathetic; you have no intention of ending discrimination of all groups. You are only self serving.

Maybe it wasn't disciminatory, it can be viewed as an offensive statement.

Just because you didn't list it doesn't mean that you've did not infer it.

[Inv3rted]

For forget's sake, stop being trolled so easily by Otis.

[A.R.C.]

Combining topic titles is fun.

[General Nick]

Combining topic titles is fun.

"I converted, I had love with my TV."

[dkamm65]

-handicappedquoteoozingwithstupiditysomuchsothatimnotevengointoreplybecauseihateryousnip-

While you wallow in your own stupidity, I will continue this argument will my shoes. I will more than likely get more educated replies out of them.

[ChexGuy331]

I have nothing better to say to assmitten and cunthrox than gtfo.

[tay104]

I would really like to smack each and everyone of you for not being able to have a calm, mature discussion without resorting to name-calling and whatnot.  That is all.

[ChexGuy331]

Dude, it's the blockland forums. Don't set your expectations too high.

[Chriz]

Dude, it's the blockland forums. Don't set your expectations too high.

If you said that in different words, I would've placed that on my profile.

I now want to convert to a Pastafarian.

[Valen]

I would really like to smack each and everyone of you for not being able to have a calm, mature discussion without resorting to name-calling and whatnot.  That is all.

Have you been around here ever?