Author Topic: The White House Hunger Games: ThErE aRe No EpStEiN fILeS  (Read 34233 times)

guy is wearing a mask in the pure summer my dude. ya u can tell
that photo is from a facebook post from his mom in fall of 2020, about him wearing a mask when he was required to to go to his first day of school



i wrote a long response to mod man but it wont let me post it maybe its a sign to log off :cookieMonster:
« Last Edit: Today at 01:37:57 PM by ultimamax »

I just don't get how it's so hard to understand the basic concept of having humility and respect for people not of your skin color
you should do that for anyone, regardless of skin color, hair color, eye color, etc. the fact that you even bring skin color into the equation seems tribal in itself.

you should do that for anyone, regardless of skin color, hair color, eye color, etc. the fact that you even bring skin color into the equation seems tribal in itself.

It's almost like this country was founded on the ownership of a particular race of folk, then even after abolishing that we created segregation and discrimination laws to justify further societal mistreatment, and so as a result that particular difference of skin tone is what's brought up in almost evergreen like relevance

the fact that you even bring skin color into the equation seems tribal in itself.
You did it first and i was just going off of that???????
for example, when I was growing up, racism wasn't really thing - very rare and unheard of. It wasn't until recent years the term started getting thrown around again so often,
and now a person who loves their country and wants to keep hold of traditional American values, for example: exercising their freedom of speech, is labeled a tribal or a national socialist.
And then mod-man perpetuated that same point of discussion and i partook in it accordingly?????????

How do i discuss the topic of racism with those who don't seem to fully grasp it without bringing color into it when racism is all about that??????????
« Last Edit: Today at 04:16:00 PM by Masterlegodude »

It's almost like this country was founded on the ownership of a particular race of folk, then even after abolishing that we created segregation and discrimination laws to justify further societal mistreatment, and so as a result that particular difference of skin tone is what's brought up in almost evergreen like relevance
slavery was a thing for a long time, even before america was founded, and not always specific to a group of people of a particular race. but just to throw this out there, white people were slaves too in the past. that doesn't give me the right to act like a victim of a hate crime or accuse people of racism / classism simply because my ancestors went through some terrible stuff.

You did it first and i was just going off of that???????
I mentioned traditional american values such as freedom of speech, to which you followed up by saying

"A person who wants to uphold tribal traditions is labeled a tribal"

his point is that he never said being american is tribal
he surely implied it

In what scenario is someone being called a tribal or a national socialist while exercising their free speech unless they are being tribal or a national socialist? And if this whole ordeal had nothing to do with racism or national socialists in the first place, then why did you bring it up at all when you only meant freedom of speech as "traditional American values"?

The fact that you brought up racism at all in the first place led me to believe that's what you meant by any of that

Like, you started out bringing up racism, and then brought up freedom of speech as an example of American traditions, and then went back to racism and national socialists
« Last Edit: Today at 07:51:22 PM by Masterlegodude »

In what scenario is someone being called a tribal or a national socialist while exercising their free speech unless they are being tribal or a national socialist? And if this whole ordeal had nothing to do with racism or national socialists in the first place, then why did you bring it up at all when you only meant freedom of speech as "traditional American values"?

The fact that you brought up racism at all in the first place led me to believe that's what you meant by any of that

Like, you started out bringing up racism, and then brought up freedom of speech as an example of American traditions, and then went back to racism and national socialists
My entire point was that many people labeled Charlie Kirk as such, and he was assassinated. Although we don't know the exact motive, one can only suspect the shooter felt this way about Charlie.

Until there's any evidence of the shooter being a leftist, you can go forget yourself.
recent news and a speech from the governer of utah is saying the shooter did in fact have radicalized leftist ideology, although specific details have yet to emerge. more info on tuesday i guess