Author Topic: The White House Hunger Games: ThErE aRe No EpStEiN fILeS  (Read 35039 times)

guy is wearing a mask in the pure summer my dude. ya u can tell
that photo is from a facebook post from his mom in fall of 2020, about him wearing a mask when he was required to to go to his first day of school



i wrote a long response to mod man but it wont let me post it maybe its a sign to log off :cookieMonster:
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 01:37:57 PM by ultimamax »

I just don't get how it's so hard to understand the basic concept of having humility and respect for people not of your skin color
you should do that for anyone, regardless of skin color, hair color, eye color, etc. the fact that you even bring skin color into the equation seems tribal in itself.

you should do that for anyone, regardless of skin color, hair color, eye color, etc. the fact that you even bring skin color into the equation seems tribal in itself.

It's almost like this country was founded on the ownership of a particular race of folk, then even after abolishing that we created segregation and discrimination laws to justify further societal mistreatment, and so as a result that particular difference of skin tone is what's brought up in almost evergreen like relevance

the fact that you even bring skin color into the equation seems tribal in itself.
You did it first and i was just going off of that???????
for example, when I was growing up, racism wasn't really thing - very rare and unheard of. It wasn't until recent years the term started getting thrown around again so often,
and now a person who loves their country and wants to keep hold of traditional American values, for example: exercising their freedom of speech, is labeled a tribal or a national socialist.
And then mod-man perpetuated that same point of discussion and i partook in it accordingly?????????

How do i discuss the topic of racism with those who don't seem to fully grasp it without bringing color into it when racism is all about that??????????
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 04:16:00 PM by Masterlegodude »

It's almost like this country was founded on the ownership of a particular race of folk, then even after abolishing that we created segregation and discrimination laws to justify further societal mistreatment, and so as a result that particular difference of skin tone is what's brought up in almost evergreen like relevance
slavery was a thing for a long time, even before america was founded, and not always specific to a group of people of a particular race. but just to throw this out there, white people were slaves too in the past. that doesn't give me the right to act like a victim of a hate crime or accuse people of racism / classism simply because my ancestors went through some terrible stuff.

You did it first and i was just going off of that???????
I mentioned traditional american values such as freedom of speech, to which you followed up by saying

"A person who wants to uphold tribal traditions is labeled a tribal"

his point is that he never said being american is tribal
he surely implied it

In what scenario is someone being called a tribal or a national socialist while exercising their free speech unless they are being tribal or a national socialist? And if this whole ordeal had nothing to do with racism or national socialists in the first place, then why did you bring it up at all when you only meant freedom of speech as "traditional American values"?

The fact that you brought up racism at all in the first place led me to believe that's what you meant by any of that

Like, you started out bringing up racism, and then brought up freedom of speech as an example of American traditions, and then went back to racism and national socialists
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:51:22 PM by Masterlegodude »

In what scenario is someone being called a tribal or a national socialist while exercising their free speech unless they are being tribal or a national socialist? And if this whole ordeal had nothing to do with racism or national socialists in the first place, then why did you bring it up at all when you only meant freedom of speech as "traditional American values"?

The fact that you brought up racism at all in the first place led me to believe that's what you meant by any of that

Like, you started out bringing up racism, and then brought up freedom of speech as an example of American traditions, and then went back to racism and national socialists
My entire point was that many people labeled Charlie Kirk as such, and he was assassinated. Although we don't know the exact motive, one can only suspect the shooter felt this way about Charlie.

Until there's any evidence of the shooter being a leftist, you can go forget yourself.
recent news and a speech from the governer of utah is saying the shooter did in fact have radicalized leftist ideology, although specific details have yet to emerge. more info on tuesday i guess


recent news and a speech from the governer of utah is saying the shooter did in fact have radicalized leftist ideology, although specific details have yet to emerge. more info on tuesday i guess

they're just going to go with another approach once it gets confirmed man (my guess is "huuuh why do you care about this still lmao") there is no point in arguing with these people

inevitably though they will all be completely disenfranchised. these absolute freaks are biologically incapable of not continuing to alienate everyone from both their immediate families, social structures, and their degenerate movement as a whole
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 09:22:48 PM by Momentum »

snip

A Republican governor lying to the public in order to appease his mob boss of a president? Never happened before. Not once.

slavery was a thing for a long time, even before america was founded, and not always specific to a group of people of a particular race. but just to throw this out there, white people were slaves too in the past. that doesn't give me the right to act like a victim of a hate crime or accuse people of racism / classism simply because my ancestors went through some terrible stuff.

Ok, so, there's this wonderful thing called context. I live (and presumably you) in America. In this country, specifically, we held a certain skin color of people as property and then disenfranchised them even after we set them "free." That history directly shapes the social, political, and economic systems we live in today.

Pointing out that "white people were slaves once too" is dodging the unique, generational reality of anti-Black racism in the US. White ethnic groups historically faced hardship, sure, but they weren't systematically barred from voting, redlined out of neighborhoods, mass-incarcerated, or targeted by Jim Crow laws. Context matters, and pretending it doesn't is just a way to minimize the oppression that actually built this country.

these absolute freaks are biologically incapable of not continuing to alienate everyone from both their immediate families, social structures, and their degenerate movement as a whole

Annnnnnd there's that national socialist stuff you gotta love. You know for trying to imply that your party isn't the tribal, bigoted, small minded, gutter trash white supremacists you all pretend not to be, you're sure fine saying the quiet parts out loud a lot more these days. Hubris is inevitable now.

Quote
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox said that the suspect in the killing of Charlie Kirk is "not cooperating" with authorities as the investigation into the motive of the shooting continues.

Quote
Cox also confirmed reports that investigators have interviewed Robinsons roommate, who was described as a "romantic partner" and is transitioning from male to female.

Quote
"This partner has been incredibly cooperative, had no idea that this was happening, and is working with investigators right now," Cox said on CNN.

And here is the kicker: even if someone convinces the MSM that he is a leftist, not only is the shooter once again another white male, but that so-called "degenerate transmission" (who, despite Tucker Carlsons and Momentum's worst demon-infested wet dreams, did not actually shoot anyone) has been more cooperative with law enforcement than the white, Mormon, son of Annoying Orange supporters.

No matter where this story lands, it looks bad for Donny. Even his once greatest allies, the crazy conspiracy theorists, have turned on him cause we all know he was in the Epstein files.



The current state of politics in a nutshell.

Oh, just cause this one appeared on my news feed:

Fox News host Brian Kilmeade apologizes for saying mentally ill homeless people should be executed

Tell me again which side of the aisle routinely calls for violence?

"Just kill 'em."

Jesus, this man gets paid millions to shove right-wing brainrot into boomer's eyeballs and you think leftists are violent. Sure, Jan.