Religious Stupidity

[Flying Ace]

did you know that originally science was invented by Christians whoo feel the irony if what it has become today




also mage do you use steam :D?

[Ad Bot]

[*Magick* Mage]

did you know that originally science was invented by Christians whoo feel the irony if what it has become today


also mage do you use steam :D?

Steam is evil! D:

Double post, but--

Russian, thinking the starting concepts of which control a certain event is created by god is just nitpicking through a vast amount of possibilities.

It's like saying that, hell, one of us may be controlling these numbers.

However, the most reasonable way to look at it is by saying they're not controlled, but they're completely random.

Quit pulling random ass assumptions out of your ass, especially when trying to argue.  It doesn't work that way.

I believe Russian was approaching it under the assumption that there is a God, explaining how he may control it, in response to Oasis's comment saying In other words, he was responding to

But as a Catholic/Christian, do you believe that "God" controls those? Or do you accept scientific fact that the sea is controlled by the celestial bodies, the wind, and other Earthly features?

Oasis's question with his own belief, and explaining how it works, not arguing nor debating. To a person that believes God effects the world, yet they are pinned as science explains much about the physical world, Russian's theory (Or whomever created it) provides a rational explanation to how God effects the world, while still coinciding with scientific discoveries.

I hate when churches have pictures of Jesus for one they don't know what he looked like and 2 he for sure was not WHITE he was a jew lol

I always imagined Jesus having a olive-oil, tanned sort of skin. But that is only because I know Jesus was Italian at heart. Just look at all the wine he drank.

I'm quoting this, because no one sees anything on the bottom of the previous page. :c

[Flying Ace]

Steam is evil! D:

wat? game buying systems are evil  :o

[*Magick* Mage]

wat? game buying systems are evil  :o

Yes.

They are made by Satan, even if I don't believe in him. :o

[Flying Ace]

are you in some kinda colt :o

[*Magick* Mage]

are you in some kinda colt :o

I'm not a fish. :c

[Flying Ace]

Lol'd

[Xiofxic]

They're both two completely different things, bro.

Also, I'm calling someone stupid for, once again, considering a>b>a.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_dynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtonian_physics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

Huuurrrrr nope no math in science at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

Something you're not showing.

[*Magick* Mage]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_dynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtonian_physics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

Huuurrrrr nope no math in science at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

Something you're not showing.

Lalam said they are two different subjects, friend, not that they are excluded from each other. Most everything has some math in it, for as Galileo Galilei said, "Mathematics is the language with which GOD has written the universe." :D!

[Lalam24]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_dynamics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newtonian_physics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

Huuurrrrr nope no math in science at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

Something you're not showing.

Zio, I'm surprised as to how stupid you can act.

I never said it wasn't apart of it, I just said they're not the same thing.  Maybe you need to look a little deeper into something before criticizing the ass out of it.

[Xiofxic]

Lalam said they are two different subjects, friend, not that they are excluded from each other. Most everything has some math in it, for as Galileo Galilei said, "Mathematics is the language with which GOD has written the universe." :D!

My point is that the fields of physics and chemistry are pure mathematics and all other fields of macro-science are tied to these. Science is based on mathematical proofs and no amount of sementics argued by Lalam will change that.

[*Magick* Mage]

My point is that the fields of physics and chemistry are pure mathematics and all other fields of macro-science are tied to these. Science is based on mathematical proofs and no amount of sementics argued by Lalam will change that.

If they were pure mathematics, they would just be called that. 

And he isn't saying they have nothing to do with each other, he is saying that they are two different topics, though both do coincide with the other. Science is gathering knowledge about the world around us, while math is the study of quantity, structure, space, and change. They both have a vast amount to do with each other, however Lalam is only stating that they are not synonymous terms in most, if not all, cases.

There is no need to jump down his throat if you misunderstood what he was saying. :o

[Lalam24]

If they were pure mathematics, they would just be called that. 

This^

There's a point at which it's no longer pure mathematics, but partial assumption.

It's physically impossible to prove any past events, and thus, it isn't all based directly off of math.

[Xiofxic]

This^

There's a point at which it's no longer pure mathematics, but partial assumption.

It's physically impossible to prove any past events, and thus, it isn't all based directly off of math.

Past events aren't science, it's history. If you're talking about the big bang theory it's supported by a large amount of mathematical data as well. Red shift, cosmic radiation, etc.

But be my guest and argue based purely off your own conjecture laced with ad hom attacks.

[Xiofxic]

If they were pure mathematics, they would just be called that. 

And he isn't saying they have nothing to do with each other, he is saying that they are two different topics, though both do coincide with the other. Science is gathering knowledge about the world around us, while math is the study of quantity, structure, space, and change. They both have a vast amount to do with each other, however Lalam is only stating that they are not synonymous terms in most, if not all, cases.

There is no need to jump down his throat if you misunderstood what he was saying. :o

So because the English language language has 2 different for terms which both predate modern science then they're separate concepts eh. This is what we call a semantic argument. What if a language refered to both as forms of science then would they both be science or would it only count in that language?