Red Dead Redemption: Its almost here.

[Kevdude]

I refuse to believe that you don't see the obvious differences.

I just pointed out a difference and since the image is resized larger it is invalid

[Ad Bot]

[dkamm65]

I just pointed out a difference and since the image is resized larger it is invalid

It's not resized, the PS3 just blurs the game really bad. And there's more than just the path on the right. All of the textures are much smaller, the grass is thinned substantially, and the sky looks a bit worse.

[Kevdude]

It's not resized, the PS3 just blurs the game really bad. And there's more than just the path on the right. All of the textures are much smaller, the grass is thinned substantially, and the sky looks a bit worse.

1. Graphics don't make or break a game
2. That would be caused by developers
3. Not all that noticeable in game
4. Still looks pretty loving resized

[dkamm65]

1. Graphics don't make or break a game
2. That would be caused by developers
3. Not all that noticeable in game
4. Still looks pretty loving resized

1. When did I say it did?
2. It's still looks worse, no matter who's fault it is.
3. And I'm sure you've seen plenty of side by side comparisons with live footage.
4. The Map is closer to the center on PS3. If it is resized, that means it's shrunk, so the PS3 version should look sharper, which is not the case.

[Kevdude]

4. The Map is closer to the center on PS3. If it is resized, that means it's shrunk, so the PS3 version should look sharper, which is not the case.

Resize can mean it's been made larger or smaller dumbass

3. And I'm sure you've seen plenty of side by side comparisons with live footage.

For Assassin's Creed and Gamespot forgot to turn on certain features for the PS3

1. When did I say it did?

If you keep bringing it up like this you obviously must think so

2. It's still looks worse, no matter who's fault it is.

You seem to think that the 360 is so much better for this

[Splatter U]

I doubt that the ebox250 looks better, somthing is wrong with that pic.

[Kevdude]

I doubt that the ebox250 looks better, somthing is wrong with that pic.

Agreed. Still mad as hell

[Solid]

It's not resized, the PS3 just blurs the game really bad. And there's more than just the path on the right. All of the textures are much smaller, the grass is thinned substantially, and the sky looks a bit worse.

The only difference I see is the PS3 version looks lighter.

Who cares, WaW looks better on the PS3. Fallout 3 looks and plays better on the PS3. A lot of games look better or worse on both.

Rockstar probably made it on the 360 and ported it over. Causing some errors.

[Illidan]

The only difference I see is the PS3 version looks lighter.

Who cares, WaW looks better on the PS3. Fallout 3 looks and plays better on the PS3. A lot of games look better or worse on both.

Rockstar probably made it on the 360 and ported it over. Causing some errors.

GTA IV runs more smooth on the 360 as I've seen, so it's not surprising the 360 has slightly improved graphics compared to the PS3 in RDR.

[XRobo]

Dkamm, Kevdude, graphics don't make a game.

Seriously.

[tails]

I think i'll hold out for the PC version.

[Illidan]

Is anyone else experiencing the "invisibility" crap in multiplayer free-roam?

[dkamm65]

Dkamm, Kevdude, graphics don't make a game.

Seriously.

When the forget did I say they did?

Seriously.

[Illidan]

When the forget did I say they did?

Seriously.

You didn't

They're just butthurt that the 360 version looks better than the PS3 version

[dkamm65]

You didn't

They're just butthurt that the 360 version looks better than the PS3 version

That, and I think XRobo has taken on a very nasty attitude lately.