Author Topic: Modern stuffware 2  (Read 8088 times)


It's technically MW2. Like World at War is technically CoD5.

Yeah just because I am making a project of it you cry.
Get out.

Edit:
Here is something for you.
Go ahead and post "MODREN stuffWER 2" , to imply your opinion into everyone else , like your opinion is the only one.
It's ok to do that , if you just had valid arguments.

"I HAZ THIZ WEAPONZ AND KILLZ YOUZ ALLZ NAOWZ"


Sounds like every First Person Shooter made, what's with all the Z's?


Sounds like every First Person Shooter made, what's with all the Z's?

Zat Mah boyz, iz thatz old slangz

I play Counterstrike: Source instead. Actually pretty good balanced, no "I HAZ THIZ WEAPONZ AND KILLZ YOUZ ALLZ NAOWZ"
Awp, M4, AK47, etc notwithstanding eh?

It's technically MW2. Like World at War is technically CoD5.
That's not accurate in either direction, you're a moron. The game title is Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Not Call of Duty 6 Modern Warfare 2, because it's not part of the series, it's just part of the franchise, the same as WaW is not Call of Duty 5. That's like calling McDonalds, McDonalds 3543: French Fries Ahoy. You don't refer to a number because there ISN'T one, it's part of a franchise, not a series. CoD4: MW however had the number in the title so it is accurate to call it CoD4.

Coll of d00dy: mawdrn waffer 2

If it had a better game base and more balancing, it would increase my likings of it quite a lot.  The campaign is the better part of the game in my opinion.  Online, is frankly just horrible.  Servers crash while migrating hosts constantly, you catch boosters in almost every free for all that you see, and no-one enjoys being spawnraped every two or three seconds by a chopper gunner/ac130.  And honestly, One Man Army and M203s?  I certainly hope that Activision has cleaned up its act by the next game or couple of games.  For their sake.

There, there's your valid reason.

Agreed. 1942 was the best game and will always be the best game. BF2 sucked in comparison. 1943 was decent but not the same as 1942. I want them to remake 1942 and to stop richardING AROUND with "modern" warfare stuff.
What made BF2 so bad?

Stop calling people bandwagoning just because they also, SOMEHOW think a stuffty game is stuff. Just like everybody else.

That's not accurate in either direction, you're a moron. The game title is Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Not Call of Duty 6 Modern Warfare 2, because it's not part of the series, it's just part of the franchise, the same as WaW is not Call of Duty 5. That's like calling McDonalds, McDonalds 3543: French Fries Ahoy. You don't refer to a number because there ISN'T one, it's part of a franchise, not a series. CoD4: MW however had the number in the title so it is accurate to call it CoD4.
Thank you!
If we followed how they want to call things, we would be on Final Fantasy 22 by now.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2010, 01:27:32 PM by ladios »

Thank you!
If we followed how they want to call things, we would be on Final Fantasy 17 by now.
haha no, "series" games up to 13, "Spin offs" There are more then 22

And Tactics being the best of all of them.