Poll

Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?

Yes
No
Yes, but not for several years

Author Topic: Opinions - Should we destroy the last bit of the smallpox disease?  (Read 118895 times)

they should be allowed to have children as long as the disease isn't serious

they should be allowed to have children as long as the disease isn't serious
Uh, what disease isn't serious.


Uh, what disease isn't serious.

TIL genetics are irrelevant
« Last Edit: August 04, 2017, 02:23:25 AM by Kearn »

okay, i shouldn't have been born because i have a genetic disorder that makes 2 permanent teeth not form!
That's not a disease you idiot, a disease is something like AIDS or Herpes Simplex, or cancer.

Sadly, because of the constitution, we have to let them have children, since it falls under "The right to persue happiness."

"The right to persue happiness."

Goddammit I loving hate that.


As long as the disease cannot be transmitted any other way

Goddammit I loving hate that.

What is that supposed to mean?

Would you want to give inheriting diseases at birth?
Certainly you wouldn't want to, so why would you make someone go through that?

I say no, unless they're curable.

"even though we have herpes and uncured chlamydia, lets have 10 kids"

I mean ideally we could isolate and get rid of hereditary disease completely after several generations (since genes and the like sometimes skip a generation, I'm not sure if hereditary diseases do also but I'm assuming they do), though in reality that probably wouldn't happen. Still, we could greatly reduce them. I do feel kind of rude, but I'd have to say no. It'd be worth it in the long run for the human species.

Sadly, because of the constitution, we have to let them have children, since it falls under "The right to persue happiness."
condoms bro
use em

or, you know, adopt a kid. creating some kid that has AIDS and all kinds of stuff is forgeted up, even if it was just the parents "pursuing happiness".
« Last Edit: March 29, 2011, 05:52:09 PM by Fredulus »

I say no

And why the forget would you want to have kids when there are thousands starving in third world countries.
I feel like some people only have kids for the sake of traditionalism.

I say no

And why the forget would you want to have kids when there are thousands starving in third world countries.
I feel like some people only have kids for the sake of traditionalism.
If you're saying that people should adopt instead of have kids, you're stupid. If you adopt a kid, the kid isn't a part of you, its just another person.