Author Topic: Kerbal Space Program, Or: How I learned to stop worrying and love THRUSTERRRSSSS  (Read 347105 times)

Observe the below attachment.

Observe the below attachment.
I'm probably missing something because you're just showing the amount of files in KSP's parts folder?

I run at a very low FPS rate with 373 parts.
you guys have either had less, or more on a better system.

I run at a very low FPS rate with 373 parts.
you guys have either had less, or more on a better system.
I don't think just having the parts would change it at all, since they're not being used. I could be wrong though.

I don't think just having the parts would change it at all, since they're not being used. I could be wrong though.
I run faster with less in the folder.
also, Plugins.
And remember, KSP runs complex math in the background for orbiting and stuff, but does not removed old data and just inflates RAM usage as you play; this is a particularly bad thing for low RAM PCs or 32x systems. (2Gb RAM limit, KSP eats it fast.)

I run faster with less in the folder.
also, Plugins.
And remember, KSP runs complex math in the background for orbiting and stuff, but does not removed old data and just inflates RAM usage as you play; this is a particularly bad thing for low RAM PCs or 32x systems. (2Gb RAM limit, KSP eats it fast.)
Can you stop crapping up the thread with your demo/I lag with 7,000 addons garbage? Thanks.

Actually, Full now.
and only 373, don't exaggerate.

I run faster with less in the folder.
also, Plugins.
And remember, KSP runs complex math in the background for orbiting and stuff, but does not removed old data and just inflates RAM usage as you play; this is a particularly bad thing for low RAM PCs or 32x systems. (2Gb RAM limit, KSP eats it fast.)
(assuming by this post you have 2 gb of ram)
According to the KSP wiki, the minimum requirements for the paid version (as of v.17) is 1 gb of ram, 2 is recommended. However, with mods, you should have 4+ gb of ram.
http://kspwiki.nexisonline.net/wiki/System_Specs

Yeah, i never listen to recommended RAM stuff, unless its a base thing.
it runs fine for a few launches, only a little slow.
after around 5 it crashed with out of memory.
I want a better toaster.
http://www.xfire.com/profile/genfirebird1/
at the bottom.


Am I the only one who gives a name to a "series" of rockets?
So far, I've gotten better at getting rockets into orbit, but getting them into orbit with loads of fuel is a different story.
Attempts at docking 2 spacecraft to add fuel: 3
Successful attempts: 0
Attempts with any fuel left: 2

Am I the only one who gives a name to a "series" of rockets?
The KW Rocketry pack has some series named rockets.
and Nova Punch I think.

also, me, every 2 or 3 modifications to the rockets I save them under a new name.

I make my rockets like this
(Purpose) (Roman Numeral of variant) Mk(roman numeral of edit)
Probe II MkIV
Satellite X MkIII
Lander V MkII

Am I the only one who gives a name to a "series" of rockets?
So far, I've gotten better at getting rockets into orbit, but getting them into orbit with loads of fuel is a different story.
Attempts at docking 2 spacecraft to add fuel: 3
Successful attempts: 0
Attempts with any fuel left: 2
Yep, I remember my first series of rockets in my attempt to get into orbit. Pretty sure that was the Breeze series.

Then the Kerbis rockets I think are my attempt at getting to the Mun.

I can get a ton of things into orbit, I can land on other planets, but docking is difficult for me :(