Which is better, 32-bit Windows or 64-bit?

[Kochieboy]

64

Cause I'm a 64 bit user

[Ad Bot]

[Tom]

Obviously more bits are better, but isn't 64 useless if you don't have a 64 bit processor?

So in a sense 32 could be better if you had a 32 bit processor.

[Chrono]

Obviously more bits are better, but isn't 64 useless if you don't have a 64 bit processor?

So in a sense 32 could be better if you had a 32 bit processor.

Incompatibilities (especially something obvious like that) don't make something perform worse.

[otto-san]

Obviously more bits are better, but isn't 64 useless if you don't have a 64 bit processor?

So in a sense 32 could be better if you had a 32 bit processor.

Most newer prebuilt computers come with 64bit processors.

[.:FancyPants:.]

64. No argument.

Dammit I was using my iPod and I somehow hit 32 and then submitted my answer. FFF

[Night Fox]

two people are dumbasses

[steve5451]

64-bit Windows is so outdated.

I use 128 bit Windows 8.

[turntechGodhead]

64 bit

because its larger than 32 therefore its better

[MillCzarr]

64. No argument.

[Sandvich]

8

 

[Tyler66]

8

 

2-bit is better.

[Fredulus]

Doesn't 32-bit only allow ~16 million memory addresses?

it's something like ~4.2 billion. so, 4 gigabytes.

[Qwepir]

Who voted 32?

I did

[Tom]

Incompatibilities (especially something obvious like that) don't make something perform worse.

I don't see why any performance increase would be worth it if you can't play any games because your graphics drivers don't support 64bit.

I could just imagine the OP upgrading to a 64-bit version of Windows because we all said "it was better" and then messing up his computer.

[Wavelength]

Whats the difference?