The 2011 Spike Video Game Awards

Author Topic: The 2011 Spike Video Game Awards  (Read 10224 times)

Quote
Aggregator    Score
GameRankings    92.07%[131]
(60 reviews)
Metacritic    92/100[132]
(90 reviews)
Review scores
Publication    Score
1UP.com    A[133]
Computer and Video Games    9.5/10[134]
Edge    9/10[135]
Electronic Gaming Monthly    9/10[136]
Eurogamer    8/10[137]
Game Informer    9.5/10[138]
GamePro    5/5 stars[139]
Game Revolution    A[140]
GamesMaster    91%[132]
GameSpot    9/10[141]
GamesTM    9/10[142]
GamesRadar    9/10[143]
GameTrailers    9.5/10[144]
IGN    10/10[145]
Official PlayStation Magazine (US)    10/10[132]
Official PlayStation Magazine (UK)    10/10[146]
Play Magazine    90%[147]
PSM3    9.6/10[132]
VideoGamer.com    9/10[148]

Are you sure about it being mediocre? If it were mediocre it would get reviews similar to Duke Nukem Forever.

aren't you one of those people that are like GAME REVIEW SITES ARE SO BIASED AAAAAA I HATE THEM MAN IM A HIPSTER I LIKE INDY GAMES

I make games, and all of them are free. Problem officer?
Game companies*.

They are a company. The point of companies is to make money, right?

They are a company. The point of companies is to make money, right?
Yes.  You're a one-man team working on a game.

I didn't buy U3 but the beta was fun :o

aren't you one of those people that are like GAME REVIEW SITES ARE SO BIASED AAAAAA I HATE THEM MAN IM A HIPSTER I LIKE INDY GAMES

That depends, do you take what I say and turn it around?

not as highly anticipated as skyrim.




















besides, uncharted 3 has automatic ammo pickup.

They are a company. The point of companies is to make money, right?

There is games specifically made for money (MW3) and then there is games that are made specifically for fun.

Are you sure about it being mediocre? If it were mediocre it would get reviews similar to Duke Nukem Forever.
Duke Nukem Forever was bad, not mediocre.

There is games specifically made for money (MW3) and then there is games that are made specifically for fun.
Sequels are made for money.

There is games specifically made for money (MW3) and then there is games that are made specifically for fun.
Are you kidding me?

There is games specifically made for money (anything good) and then there is games that are made specifically for fun (stuffty flash games).

That depends, do you take what I say and turn it around?

There is games specifically made for money (MW3) and then there is games that are made specifically for fun.
Games are made for money, except for free games. No exceptions.

There is games specifically made for money (MW3) and then there is games that are made specifically for fun.
at the end of the day, companies need money.

at the end of the day, companies need money.

and at the beginning of the day, and at the middle of the day

Getting money is not the point I was obviously trying to make.

There are developers that make games to only get money and then there are developers that make games for fun, money is not important to them but they use that money to continue making more games.



You guys clearly missed my point.

Duke Nukem Forever was bad, not mediocre.

And why is Uncharted 3 mediocre? Did you even play it? (second time asking)