Author Topic: The 2011 Spike Video Game Awards (Read 10296 times)

Qwepir · December 10, 2011, 08:50:33 PM

Quote from: Lørd Tøny on December 10, 2011, 08:44:19 PM

WHAT! No Uncharted 3?!

lol as if a mediocre PS3 exclusive would get goty instead of a highly-anticipated cross-platform.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

Comatose · December 10, 2011, 08:50:53 PM

they left 2 categories unannounced

L�rd T�ny · December 10, 2011, 08:51:24 PM

Quote from: Qwepir on December 10, 2011, 08:50:33 PM

lol as if a mediocre PS3 exclusive would get goty instead of a highly-anticipated cross-platform.

Um, Uncharted 2.

Cybersix · December 10, 2011, 08:52:24 PM

Quote from: DracoSoul on December 10, 2011, 08:46:24 PM

WHAT ARE THOSE RICELICKERS SAYING

I do believe it is milk drinkers

Donro98 · December 10, 2011, 08:53:25 PM

Quote from: Qwepir on December 10, 2011, 08:50:33 PM

lol as if a mediocre PS3 exclusive would get goty instead of a highly-anticipated cross-platform.

Can't stand Exclusives, they would do so much better cross platform. I do understand that there are some exceptions.

L�rd T�ny · December 10, 2011, 08:54:39 PM

Quote from: Donro98 on December 10, 2011, 08:53:25 PM

Can't stand Exclusives, they would do so much better cross platform. I do understand that there are some exceptions.

Implying all game companies are in it for the money.

Besides, exclusives are advertised by the console makers themselves.

Cybersix · December 10, 2011, 08:56:58 PM

Quote from: Donro98 on December 10, 2011, 08:53:25 PM

Can't stand Exclusives, they would do so much better cross platform. I do understand that there are some exceptions.

Then there wouldn't be a point to having more than one console in the market.

Nickelob Ultra · December 10, 2011, 08:57:33 PM

Quote from: L�rd T�ny on December 10, 2011, 08:54:39 PM

Implying all game companies are in it for the money.

Besides, exclusives are advertised by the console makers themselves.

wrooooooooooooong.

All game companies ARE in it for the money. Seriously, why else would they make the damn games? They don't do it just because they're bored. They do it because it's their interest + to earn profits to be paid to put food on their tables. Some put more effort into their games and communicate more with their fans.

L�rd T�ny · December 10, 2011, 08:58:10 PM

Quote from: Nickelob Ultra on December 10, 2011, 08:57:33 PM

wrooooooooooooong.

All game companies ARE in it for the money.

Nope

Bloody Mary · December 10, 2011, 09:00:26 PM

Quote from: L�rd T�ny on December 10, 2011, 08:58:10 PM

Nope

Please name some developers that are NOT in it for the money.

Nickelob Ultra · December 10, 2011, 09:00:33 PM

Quote from: L�rd T�ny on December 10, 2011, 08:58:10 PM

Nope

Glad to see you're taking the title of "village idiot" to the fullest.

L�rd T�ny · December 10, 2011, 09:01:30 PM

Quote from: Bloody Mary on December 10, 2011, 09:00:26 PM

Please name some developers that are NOT in it for the money.

Eric Hartman.

He needs the money to live, he doesn't need the money for commercial bullstuff.

Nickelob Ultra · December 10, 2011, 09:02:13 PM

Quote from: L�rd T�ny on December 10, 2011, 09:01:30 PM

Eric Hartman.

He needs the money to live, he doesn't need the money for commercial bullstuff.

By definition then, he's "in it for the money".

Donro98 · December 10, 2011, 09:02:37 PM

Quote from: L�rd T�ny on December 10, 2011, 08:54:39 PM

Implying all game companies are in it for the money.

Besides, exclusives are advertised by the console makers themselves.

I know they aren't, but still there are great games on the PS3 (Uncharted for example) that I would love to play, but all my friends play Xbox, I chose Xbox and now I feel like I am missing out.

DracoSoul · December 10, 2011, 09:02:37 PM

Quote from: L�rd T�ny on December 10, 2011, 09:01:30 PM

Eric Hartman.

He needs the money to live, he doesn't need the money for commercial bullstuff.

at first i was like "who is that"
then i was like "wow you're loving dumb dude" to myself