Author Topic: Target is handicapped  (Read 4029 times)

I don't blame target. Your friend shouldn't have touched the kid. Instead, he should have told a worker there. You and your other friend shouldn't have just walked away. You also could have told someone that worked there. Though, the person that told you that you were involved is stupid, because yes, you didn't do anything, but because you were his friend and just ignored it is what he should have had as a reason to ban you from the store.

I don't blame target. Your friend shouldn't have touched the kid. Instead, he should have told a worker there. You and your other friend shouldn't have just walked away. You also could have told someone that worked there. Though, the person that told you that you were involved is stupid, because yes, you didn't do anything, but because you were his friend and just ignored it is what he should have had as a reason to ban you from the store.
Right, because this is the first thing a grown man thinks when he's being constantly insulted.  You have to understand that any normal man probably would've smacked the kid too.  Hell, I would've.  Sounded like an undisciplined brat.

Where the forget are the parents anyway?



Either way, there's no reason to ban you from the store.  I'd actually pester Target's executives about it.

this story reminds me of all the admins that are like

you both are arguing

i'm gonna ban you both if you dont shut up, even if bob WAS annoying steve.

kthxbai

Right, because this is the first thing a grown man thinks when he's being constantly insulted.  You have to understand that any normal man probably would've smacked the kid too.  Hell, I would've.  Sounded like an undisciplined brat.

Where the forget are the parents anyway?



Either way, there's no reason to ban you from the store.  I'd actually pester Target's executives about it.

It's the first thing a mature guy thinks. You don't hit a kid that clearly doesn't know any better. Hence, the kid being alone, the parents probably don't give a stuff. But I guess your right about BANNING someone from the store. Now that I think about it, I guess that would be kind of ridiculous. But, it's still the right thing to do.

man that guy is SUCH a badmin.



In all honesty that is loving stupid. Hell, I love target, but that one just seems loving handicapped.

man that guy is SUCH a badmin.



In all honesty that is loving stupid. Hell, I love target, but that one just seems loving handicapped.

this is why the majority of the current generation of children is handicapped
they are such wannabe hipsters and when they do something unforgivable and you do something back, you suddenly get all the blame.

what's even worse is that the security guard saw you and jake did nothing, yet he banned you from the store
that's why i seriously look down on some people.

It's the first thing a mature guy thinks. You don't hit a kid that clearly doesn't know any better. Hence, the kid being alone, the parents probably don't give a stuff. But I guess your right about BANNING someone from the store. Now that I think about it, I guess that would be kind of ridiculous. But, it's still the right thing to do.

Scenario, Opening scene: A stuff kid is following you and your friends around, throwing nasty insults for no reason at all. It's clear to you that this kid isn't going to get off of your back any time soon. Your friend responds soon afterwards telling the kid to turn his stuff around and go the forget away. The kid takes offense, like nothing is his fault, and continues to insult. He starts to pick a fight, and punches your friend in the head.

By your logic: the sensible thing is to ignore the kid and let him continue being a little stuff without any consequence.

Everyone knows targets and other department stores are loaded down with CAMERAS right?

That's what those black things on the ceilings are. Cameras.

There's a good chance you were seen.

Scenario, Opening scene: A stuff kid is following you and your friends around, throwing nasty insults for no reason at all. It's clear to you that this kid isn't going to get off of your back any time soon. Your friend responds soon afterwards telling the kid to turn his stuff around and go the forget away. The kid takes offense, like nothing is his fault, and continues to insult. He starts to pick a fight, and punches your friend in the head.

By your logic: the sensible thing is to ignore the kid and let him continue being a little stuff without any consequence.

When he keeps on insulting you, and then HITS you, that's when you tell someone that works there. Again, the kid clearly has parents that don't give a stuff, which results in a kid that clearly doesn't know any better. When it gets as bad as that, a good friend doesn't just walk off. He helps out. But I'd recommend in an ethical way.

i remember there were a lot of kids like that in my 8th grade class. they thought they were hot stuff just because they went around being starfishs. basically, all you have to do is find their mother or father. they will usually leave you alone if you say something like "i'm going to follow you until you go to your parent, then i'm going to tell them you tried to rape me."

Everyone knows targets and other department stores are loaded down with CAMERAS right?

That's what those black things on the ceilings are. Cameras.

There's a good chance you were seen.
I know we were seen. The problem is that my friend was banned for defending himself and the rest of us were banned for knowing him.

I don't blame target. Your friend shouldn't have touched the kid.
The only reason he touched him was to restrain him to stop the punches. He even told me afterwards he didn't want to punch the kid back because he didn't want to be arrested for fighting him.

When it gets as bad as that, a good friend doesn't just walk off. He helps out. But I'd recommend in an ethical way.
The only reason we walked away was because my friend clearly had it under control. The kid hit him once and was instantly restrained. I felt it would look worse if all four of us confronted a this kid instead of one. The one who restrained the kid is also in 9th grade so they were close to the same age group. It would be terrible if I got involved. I do regret just leaving though. I figured after it happened the kid would have learned not to mess with random people and that would be the end of it. If I would have known Target would trace us all I would have stayed to file a report.

Where the forget are the parents anyway?
No idea.



Either way, there's no reason to ban you from the store.  I'd actually pester Target's executives about it.
I already plan on it haha.

While Bopizku has a bit of a point, I would still go so far as to say that what John did should be acceptable and not result in a ban.

After all, the kid (despite being a minor) was still the one who initiated the conflict by throwing the first punch. John reacted in a manner a lot of people would react in, but he went a step further by not even physically harming the kid. If anything, this could be claimed as self defense, and there are obviously several witnesses who would attest to that.

I'd say you should defiantly cause a ruckus with higher ups; even if you can't convince them that John was in the right by defended himself, at the very least you and your other friend were obviously not a part of the fight and should have not even been considered as a part of the mess. For all the managers knew, you two were passing by who happened to witness the event. Really, this is just bureaucratic bullstuff.

that sucks man i would just tell him to forget off & stop being a little stuff.

Target, dey sell good slushies.
TARGET DOESNT SELL SLUSHIES
They don't even sell Portal 2.
or any good games
damn it australia
Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
wow