Poll

Setting

New York
19 (25.3%)
Boston
8 (10.7%)
England
18 (24%)
Hong Kong
8 (10.7%)
Tokyo
11 (14.7%)
Chigago
11 (14.7%)

Total Members Voted: 75

Author Topic: Fallout 4 - Where should it be set?  (Read 4975 times)

SAN FRAN BABE~ We're goin places~ uguu

Chicago would be cool, I don't think it should go to Europe or Asia because the theme is old America.

I mean, look at Colorado.

USAFA could be old training grounds

Norad could be where they monitored the Nukes and you had the chance to blow up the rest of the world.

Fort Carson could be where the artillery is stored.


It could also contain three cities along I-95.
Pueblo: The cowboy-west farmlands

Colorado Springs:A suburban city with a 14'r mountain in which you can climb

Denver:The Mile high city (although the springs in higher)


With Colorado having many military outposts, why not nuke it?

I havent seen a game that is set in Seattle yet.

I think they would only bomb majour areas. Nuclear weaponry isnt cheap, and if you really want to get the job done, nuke the places that matter, like New York, DC, Vegas, Florida, ect.
Colorado is way too good looking to be nuked, methinks.
I havent seen a game that is set in Seattle yet.
I havent seen a game set in Phoenix yet.
Game devs cant just make games set in... everywhere. 

and that is exactly what i mean
no offense to fallout 3, its a good game, but bethesda didnt noticed the gaping plot holes they created
not really


only about 5% of the nuclear arsenal of the world was ICBM based. If the US had as competent an interceptor force as the game claims, it's entirely possible that most of the bombs were eliminated en-route to the target.

i think we need Missouri as the next Game but they need to add some working vehicle if you were to travel in it.

London would be amazing, But it's never going to leave the US.

I think they would only bomb majour areas. Nuclear weaponry isnt cheap, and if you really want to get the job done, nuke the places that matter, like New York, DC, Vegas, Florida, ect.
Colorado is way too good looking to be nuked, methinks.I havent seen a game set in Phoenix yet.
Game devs cant just make games set in... everywhere.  
Tons of nukes are stored in the Rockies. Why not nuke the supply of nukes.


London would be amazing, But it's never going to leave the US.
I'd love to see Big Ben still standing, but heavily damaged. That would just totally represent a whole new era of Fallout if they brought it to London.

Also, yes, vehicles would be a must. Bethesda obviously can do it. Electric custom vehicles charged by user-placed mini wind turbines or solar panels would be preferable, lol. :D

SAN FRAN BABE~ We're goin places~ uguu
San Fransisco was in Fallout 2, although all that remained of it are Chinese inhabitants of China Town and descendants of a chinese Submarine crew.

Colorado would be a horrible idea, Legion errywhere, not fun.

I would like to see more of what the NCR has done in Cali, I would like to see more civilization mixed in with the current wasteland. I say Seattle Washington. It'd be perfect some nutjob Mr. House wannabe pent up in the space needle has his own personal army and maybe have parts of Idaho explorable.

China. There was a war against them and it would be cool to have accidentally been stranded in China or something.

Colorado would be a horrible idea, Legion errywhere, not fun.

I would like to see more of what the NCR has done in Cali, I would like to see more civilization mixed in with the current wasteland. I say Seattle Washington. It'd be perfect some nutjob Mr. House wannabe pent up in the space needle has his own personal army and maybe have parts of Idaho explorable.


Some parts of idaho? I'd like to see it stretch to boise if possible, wanna see Eksi's city :V


oh hey and I remember you.