Author Topic: Abortion - Pro-life or Pro-choice  (Read 12520 times)

aa disregard
are you reading what he's posting?

"hypothetically this could happen! think of the potential" (works for both sides of the argument)
"think of yourself being wiped from existence" (not valid because we're already here to talk about it, fetuses can't think so wtf)

if he wants to give some hardline facts then go ahead

if I was a fetus I wouldn't give two stuffs if I died cause I'd be a fetus and not able to care

just sayin'

are you reading what he's posting?

"hypothetically this could happen! think of the potential" (works for both sides of the argument)
"think of yourself being wiped from existence" (not valid because we're already here to talk about it, fetuses can't think so wtf)

if he wants to give some hardline facts then go ahead


I accidentally posted :I

People should be able to have love without a condom or birth control and still abort I dont get arguments for why not

if I was a fetus I wouldn't give two stuffs if I died cause I'd be a fetus and not able to care

just sayin'

this basicly sums up the argument holy stuff


this whole thing could of been avoided with 23 words


thank you nymethus

Then you must be religious.

so uh, how does a scientific approach to laid out time being religious

fun fact, the bulk of abortions are done with a pill, when the "fetus" is still just a half ounce puddle of nothing.
that is a technical abortion, and the most common one.

but pro life people want you to believe they are using machines to yank out fully developed children.
it adds to the false cause
« Last Edit: June 15, 2012, 08:57:29 PM by Bisjac »

im sorry bisjac but that kind of sounds epic

People should be able to have love without a condom or birth control and still abort I dont get arguments for why not
Just saying the smarter thing to do is not have unprotected love in the first place so you don't have to get the abortion in the first place.

Just saying the smarter thing to do is not have unprotected love in the first place so you don't have to get the abortion in the first place.
no stuff, thanks for that

are you reading what he's posting?

"hypothetically this could happen! think of the potential" (works for both sides of the argument)
"think of yourself being wiped from existence" (not valid because we're already here to talk about it, fetuses can't think so wtf)

if he wants to give some hardline facts then go ahead

I honestly feel sorry for you. If you honestly think that ending a persons life before it begins, I feel sorry for you.

They're are no hard facts for this. There is only morals. Nobody can tell the future. You can't actually see what somebody is going to do during their life. There is no reality to uncertainty. The to-be child you are thinking about ending could be the greatest thing in your life. Ultimately, you might die during child birth. Why think of the negative? Thinking negatively never got anyone anywhere.

The only facts are. This fetus may or may not become a child. Beyond that, there is nothing.

Just saying the smarter thing to do is not have unprotected love in the first place so you don't have to get the abortion in the first place.

that would be a good point, except the bulk of population growth in the world is happening in places where there arent abortions OR birth control.
simply telling people to not have love (christians lol) is not an acceptable method.

Just saying the smarter thing to do is not have unprotected love in the first place so you don't have to get the abortion in the first place.
Abstinence is not fun, you know.

fun fact, the bulk of abortions are done with a pill, when the "fetus" is still just a half ounce puddle of nothing.
that is a technical abortion, and the most common one.

but pro choice people want you to believe they are using machines to yank out fully developed children.
it adds to the false cause
um
you mean pro-life people want us to believe pro-choice people want that, you mean?

err yeah lol. ill fix that

that would be a good point, except the bulk of population growth in the world is happening in places where there arent abortions OR birth control.
simply telling people to not have love (christians lol) is not an acceptable method.
True, but my arguement is aimed more toward the people in first world countries.