No 99% chance is just 100% but there's the case that there's that one freaky occurance that it didn't work that we can't account for.
It's like hand sanitizer killes 99.99% of germs.>.>
Uh, you just completely contradicted yourself.
If it was 100% effective, then there would never ever ever be a case of a condom not working.
99% means that there is a 1% chance, which is exactly what Otis said.
99% is not a guarantee. There's a chance of it, regardless of how small, of it not working.
With Hand Sanitizers, it's deemed 99.99% because it can't be sure.
It's not that there's likely 1 germ that gets left behind. Hand sanitizer is formed of chemicals which are near enough guaranteed to ensure that everysingle germ it comes in contact with will die.
THey only say 99.99% in case there happens to be one case where some bacteria is left, or is immune and that prevents them from being sued.
It's said 99.99% in case of fear that there is some bacteria that is immune, but in practice, it kills all bacteria.
If you use Hand Sanitizer correctly there is essentially no chance of any bacteria being left.
If you use a Condom correctly, there is still a chance of it not working. And that's due to what has happened with the condom, not the design of it. If it's been ripped or teared in packaging or handling or whatnot, then that could be the fault. The design of condoms is perfect when it leaves the factory.
I agree with pro-choice.
