Exactly. Where? Nowhere. That's why your argument is a steaming load.
Why in the forget do I have to validate the fact that you're a social failure with psychology? It's
sociology, an entirely different field you loving moron.
Plus, the burden of proof is on you, not on me. Even then, you imply I have to defend something validated by educated doctors from you, a teenage girl on the internet. There is indeed a losing battle here, but I'm not the one fighting it.
The procedure is called "genital reconstruction surgery," and 47 states you can change your legal gender without getting any kind of surgery at all.
Your legal gender, and the gender you prefer to think yourself as, are not your biological gender.
When did I once reference scientific evidence of black holes or dark matter? Mathematics is the only absolute form of proof in the universe, sweetheart. Maybe you should do your homework before posting.
Except when the mathematics don't support modern astronomical theory, so scientists completely make up stuff like black holes and dark matter to justify already-existing hypotheses.
Oh, and speaking of things you're obviously unaware of:
http://biblebabble.curbjaw.com/errors.htm
And, yes, the people who originally sited the solar system's existence thought of it to have been based entirely around earth.
Jesus christ that link is terrible, one paragraph in and:
Even as late as 1492, people were convinced that silly old Columbus was going to fall off of the earth.
NO. Nobody thought that. Even by 1492, astronomy had advanced to the point where it was common knowledge that celestial bodies were spherical. Not to mention the fact that that entire article is just nitpicking at the word choice used in a 400 year old translation of a Hebrew text.
