Earth 6.0 - Vothus

[Swat 3]

since um ppl cant control how ur countrs ppl reakt my soldrs don die becuz ther tuf

To a reasonable level, of course. You can't be running around saying that how other people react and how stuff hits it. You have to say an action, and let someone react so they can stop it.

Oh yeah, then I can say, Defcon 2.

[Ad Bot]

[HerpaDerp]

since um ppl cant control how ur countrs ppl reakt my soldrs don die becuz ther tuf

thats a complete different situation
If you shoot someone with a gun, they will get hurt
no matter what

[Swat 3]

thats a complete different situation
If you shoot someone with a gun, they will get hurt
no matter what

To add on:
If you say fight someone, you cannot decide how it turns out.
If you send a scud, you cannot decide if SAMs shoot it.
If you have a tank, you can decide who you shoot, but you have to accept that I can SMAW you
If two ships battle, you can't decide to say, "I put a huge hole in your ship and sink it." It will be nice to be sensible, on either side, to let the person say, "I shoot your ship with something!" and the victim can say, "Defensive Maneuvers go alert," or, "The Hull is breached."

Non-Scewering you Fleet tip: Don't make a stuffload of ships and place 20 500 something large-canister-shell guns.

[Mikoyan]

If you send a scud, you cannot decide if SAMs shoot it.

Jesus loving Christ you are so hypocritical

[Swat 3]

Jesus loving Christ you are so hypocritical

?
It was an example.

No need to flame.

[SWAT One]

To add on:
If you say fight someone, you cannot decide how it turns out.
If you send a scud, you cannot decide if SAMs shoot it.
If you have a tank, you can decide who you shoot, but you have to accept that I can SMAW you
If two ships battle, you can't decide to say, "I put a huge hole in your ship and sink it." It will be nice to be sensible, on either side, to let the person say, "I shoot your ship with something!" and the victim can say, "Defensive Maneuvers go alert," or, "The Hull is breached."

I'd say that if you launch anything like a scud, you must wait until 5 replies from other people to say if it hits (you may not post in this time, of course, because that's just richardery, and that shouldn't count)

[Swat 3]

I'd say that if you launch anything like a scud, you must wait until 5 replies from other people to say if it hits (you may not post in this time, of course, because that's just richardery, and that shouldn't count)

It should hit once the victim says it hits or a SAM hits it. You have to notice you must take damage, and not me OP.


I offer these statements for Oasis to help the common sense factor. *Rules in OP for Actions*

[SWAT One]

Well, think, if someone is away for a week, then the missile isn't going to wait for anything.  5-7 posts is a reasonable time to intervene.  Of course, if someone announces that they are going away, their nation would stay in a stasis, and be locked to attack, and trade and defenses stay as they were when the ruler left.

[Swat 3]

Well, think, if someone is away for a week, then the missile isn't going to wait for anything.  5-7 posts is a reasonable time to intervene.  Of course, if someone announces that they are going away, their nation would stay in a stasis, and be locked to attack, and trade and defenses stay as they were when the ruler left.

That would be fair, because if you were on vacation, and came back, it would be unfair to see people punching an unconscious horse.

In any news, were is Oasis?

[Watcher In The Myst]

I vote for SWAT 3 to be removed from this roleplay until he can get his stuff together.
Only those who are in this RP may participate in this vote.

[Swat 3]

I vote for SWAT 3 to be removed from this roleplay until he can get his stuff together.
Only those who are in this RP may participate in this vote.

...

I can't talk to SWAT about sensible ideas for me, and hopefully everyone, to follow? Just because I am pointing pinpoints wrong about the roleplaying actions you make gives you the right to kick my ass of the island? I think not.

[SWAT One]

I vote for SWAT 3 to be removed from this roleplay until he can get his stuff together.
Only those who are in this RP may participate in this vote.

Hey.  Do you think that he's not entitled to an opinion?

Do ya?

Yeh, shut up, okay.  No one wants THAT guy.

Rage over.

[blazerblock2]

@Blazer:
I think that security checks would be high due to my nation being at Defcon 5. They would've caught suspicious vans.

Regardless of if they ran them or not, they still reached their destination, there was still a firefight, the warhead still hit the white house and left a big black hole in it(hote) and they still all died.

[HerpaDerp]

I vote for SWAT 3 to be removed from this roleplay until he can get his stuff together.
Only those who are in this RP may participate in this vote.

I think Watcher in the Myst should be removed from this roleplay for being a gigantic power gaming friend.
Who is a huge hypocrite as well.

[blazerblock2]

You just say that because you still hate him.  That, and, you're being quite the hypocrite as well.  If Watcher wants to have the strongest navy in the world, he can, just like you let Miko have in 6.5.