Argue over the superior religion / belief

[Lalam24]

So, how does this make atheism flawed?

Under the assumption that these contestable gods can exist, it's flawed to assume they do not.

It's a relative flaw based on nitpicking.  According to logic as opposed to referencing mathematical fact, no, it isn't flawed.  I'm an atheist.

[Ad Bot]

[Nymethus]

So, atheism isn't flawed.

Too bad you couldn't get that out of you six pages ago!
Would have spared you from having to call me stupid, claiming I'm ignoring your posts and telling me to get better at reading!

[MillCzarr]

Too many political arguments AAAH

[Gartanium]

There is no legit proof that any of you exist and are not some twisted super computer.  I can not see into your mind, and you not mine, so I do not know any one of you are real. I don't even know the people around me are real. Due to the lack of proof none of you exist, its impossible that you exist. -Lalams logic.

I'm not trying to bash on you, and you are obviously a very smart person, but that kind of logic is "flawed" - as you like to say.

[Lalam24]

There is no legit proof that any of you exist and are not some twisted super computer.  I can not see into your mind, and you not mine, so I do not know any one of you are real. I don't even know the people around me are real. Due to the lack of proof none of you exist, its impossible that you exist. -Lalams logic.

I'm not trying to bash on you, and you are obviously a very smart person, but that kind of logic is "flawed" - as you like to say.

The flaw was based around a circumstance often disregarded because it's contestable.  However, the fact that the original texts promoted by these major religions are contradictive is a fact, one which cannot be refuted.

Two completely different things, here.

[Gartanium]

Way to avoid the point entirely.  I claim to know more about it because you're obviously unaware of the blatant flaws it presents, more specifically, in its original text.  You can try to skew the argument in your way by saying "oh, well, it was translated lots, so we don't really know!" but, the fact of the matter is, in its ORIGINAL TEXT, it promotes more inaccuracies than it does today.

Again, according to the original testament, the sun revolved around the earth.  It was changed to adapt with modern times, because we now know, for a fact, that the sun doesn't revolve around the earth.  God would've known about the bible before humans did, right?Uh, right, and I displayed them in the links, and my argument.  A paradox is the only mathematical way in which to prove an impossibility; the bible is a paradox, and I've explained how.  The teachings of the bible are meant to be delivered by a "perfect" god, yet, this god wasn't aware of the universe, or, hell, our solar system's attributes until humans were.

I know I'm bringing this up from a few posts ago, but could you please reference me to where God says that the sun revolves around the earth in the "original text"? Could you also please let me know more about the blatant flaws the LDS faith presents?  Even if there were a flaw - which I promise you there isn't - you still wouldn't know more about my relegion based upon the fact that I have studied it for 9 years longer then you. Its like saying that just because  I understand some flaws in a field of science studied at a college, I know more about that field then any one in it because I know of the flaw. Thats just not realistic.

[rockslide26]

Gary Johnson <3

[Funkadelic]

Obama saved our asses from the great depression that Bush nearly put us in.

this
obama 2012

[Lalam24]

I know I'm bringing this up from a few posts ago, but could you please reference me to where God says that the sun revolves around the earth in the "original text"? Could you also please let me know more about the blatant flaws the LDS faith presents?  Even if there were a flaw - which I promise you there isn't - you still wouldn't know more about my relegion based upon the fact that I have studied it for 9 years longer then you. Its like saying that just because  I understand some flaws in a field of science studied at a college, I know more about that field then any one in it because I know of the flaw. Thats just not realistic.

LDS is based around the book of Mormon and the Bible.  A blatant inaccuracy in the Book of Mormon is displayed here: http://carm.org/logical-proof-that-mormonism-is-false

Now, for the most heavily referred to flaws, let's take a peak at the link I've posted twice now.
http://biblebabble.curbjaw.com/errors.htm

The Stationary Earth

The idea of a stationary earth has been touched on by nearly every mythological tale.  There was Atlas who held the earth on his back, and let's not forget the turtle and elephants in Terry Pratchett's Disk World series.  It seems like this inaccurate belief found its way into the Bible also.

Job chapter 38 has a lot of mentions of a stationary earth, and as direct quotes from God.  Quotes like the following:

"Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding." - Job 38:4

"Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;" - Job 38:6

Really, do these sound like descriptions of a world that spins on its axis, while at the same time revolves around the sun?  First off, everything I have seen foundations on are stationary.  Buildings, walls, towers, etc.  Then God says that the foundation is fastened to something.  Again, does your car have a foundation attached to something?  Your house has a foundations which attaches it to the ground.  Hmmmm,  If you believe these verses, you must have a hard time finding your house whenever you go out, because it probably moved away while you were gone.

That's not all.  1 Samuel 2:8 states that "For the pillars of the earth are the Lord's, And He has set the world upon them".  If you go to any seashore, you are bound to see houses built on pillars, and yet the houses don't move.  How strange.

Psalms 93:1 flat out says that the world doesn't move. "The Lord reigns, he is clothed with majesty; The Lord is clothed, He has girded Himself with strength. Surely the world is established so that it cannot be moved."

Again, earths foundations (as well as the sky's windows) are mentioned in Isaiah 24:18- "And it shall be That he who flees from the noise of the fear Shall fall into the pit, And he who comes up from the midst of the pit, Shall be caught in the snare; For the windows from on high are open, And the foundations of the earth are shaken."

Looks like you've just broken your promise.

[rockslide26]

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Add Gary Johnson to the poll, OP
Or I will rape you <333

[Electrk]

Roses are red
Violets are blue
Add Gary Johnson to the poll, OP
Or I will rape you <333

Cliché, poor structure, bad rhythm

0/10

[Ben Grapevine]

Obama saved our asses from the great depression that Bush nearly put us in.

Uh what

[Mega-Bear]

Uh what

Lol you tard

[rockslide26]

Cliché, poor structure, bad rhythm

0/10

The exact color of the rose can be described as having a wavelength of ~620–740 nm
The proper color of the violet has a wavelength of    380–450 nm
Please consider editing your questionnaire to include the monarch of all candidates, Gary Johnson, original contributor of this discussion,
In any other case, I unfortunately will have to engage in an act of intercourse in which you do not give your consent

[Electrk]

The exact color of the rose can be described as having a wavelength of ~620–740 nm
The proper color of the violet has a wavelength of    380–450 nm
Please consider editing your questionnaire to include the monarch of all candidates, Gary Johnson, original contributor of this discussion,
In any other case, I unfortunately will have to engage in an act of intercourse in which you do not give your consent

Long-winded, three spaces between "of" and "380", presidents aren't monarchs.

4/10