Poll

Should the personal account be offered for free?

Yes. I would use it at this point.
32 (47.1%)
Yes, it should.
30 (44.1%)
No. Keep it 3.50.
6 (8.8%)

Total Members Voted: 68

Author Topic: blockStar - Hosting Administrative Services (Temporarily Locked - Page 24)  (Read 48926 times)

I don't think so, I stand by the fact that there isn't a market in this community for what he's offering and he's still not delivered anything yet.
Implementing this as a standalone server management tool without the paid server-hosting part, he has a great idea better than any part of RTB.

Once again, you're stuffting on something that comes near your work.

The market for blockStar is actually very abundant. Considering the poll, blockStar is appealing to both solo hosts and professional hosts equally.

Definitely never rely on a commitment-free poll as an indication of your market.

I'm not stuffting on anything btw, there's a difference between being a richard and voicing your opinion.

I'm not really relying on it, however, it does paint a proportional picture in my head of who wants what. And it appears that people are interested in both packages equally.

Definitely never rely on a commitment-free poll as an indication of your market.

I'm not stuffting on anything btw, there's a difference between being a richard and voicing your opinion.
Sounds like another ambitious project you've not thought through and get really excited about then never do anything with. Best of luck!!

Your opinions are a little harsh, don't you think?

I'm really aiming to get pictures up tomorrow.


$3.50 seems like a lot to pay, why not just spend $2.50 more and get managed hosting too?

$3.50 seems like a lot to pay, why not just spend $2.50 more and get managed hosting too?

Because this is for people who want to build their own service.


Because this is for people who want to build their own service.


Pretty sure the $3.50 package isn't, did you read the OP in full?

$3.50 is for people who want to host their own server, but still want to have management ability. $5.00 is self explanatory.

$3.50 is for people who want to host their own server, but still want to have management ability. $5.00 is self explanatory.
Still makes no sense to pay that much, imo.

$3.50 seems like a lot to pay, why not just spend $2.50 more and get managed hosting too?

The only realistic issue is the personal account. You pay $3.50 a month for a full server manager. Great for clans, and people who host their own servers (the majority). $5.00 a month for professional is more than fair.

The only realistic issue is the personal account. You pay $3.50 a month for a full server manager. Great for clans, and people who host their own servers (the majority). $5.00 a month for professional is more than fair.
Personal account is to much. As Lub said, you can get a server manager and a high performance server with RTB or Kaphost for 2 bucks more.

Personal account is to much. As Lub said, you can get a server manager and a high performance server with RTB or Kaphost for 2 bucks more.

I stand by the fact that there isn't a market in this community for what he's offering


Just wondering, where's this hosted? You wouldn't trust a production server for a paid service with someone like BurstNET would you?